The impact of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with hepatitis B virus infection on perinatal outcomes

Abstract

Introduction

To investigate the impact of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on perinatal outcomes.

Methods

In the study, 200 pregnant women were divided into four groups, including 50 cases with ICP and HBV infection, 50 cases with ICP, 50 cases with HBV infection, and 50 healthy pregnancies. The delivery process and perinatal outcomes were analyzed among different groups.

Results

When compared to the healthy pregnancy group, significantly increased rates of premature rupture of membranes, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and cesarean section were observed in cases of ICP, HBV infection, or ICP patients with HBV (P<0.05). Specifically, the rates of HBV infection in the newborn, fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, and birth defects in the newborn, and infant Apgar scores were higher in ICP pregnancies with HBV (56%, 48%, 16%, and 48%, respectively) than in the other groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ICP combined with HBV infection has a clear influence on perinatal infant outcomes.

Keywords:

• premature rupture of membranes
• meconium-stained amniotic fluid
• cesarean section
• fetal distress
• neonatal asphyxia
• birth defects
• Apgar scores

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) are common diseases in pregnancy. ICP results from abnormal metabolism of bile acids in the mother, often occurs in mid or late pregnancy, and is a pregnancy-specific liver disease. ICP is a minor complaint among mothers that abates quickly after parturition; however, ICP is associated with adverse fetal outcomes, such as premature rupture of membranes (PROM), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), and fetal distress, contributing to neonatal asphyxia, preterm birth, and intrauterine death.^1–6

HBV belongs to the family Hepadnaviridae and has a high infection rate, with about 600,000 patients dying of the disease worldwide every year. HBV infection has become an uncontrollable public health problem in developing countries. HBV infection triggers an autoimmune response, and ultimately leads to hepatic cell damage. Moreover, specific hormone level changes during pregnancy can place extra burden on the liver and aggravate liver disease.^7–9 HBV infection and ICP can affect the development of liver disease, but their relationship during pregnancy is not known. In present study, the authors analyzed the status of the perinatal infants in ICP- and/or HBV-infected pregnancy, in order to find out how ICP and HBV affect health, treatment, and prognosis in perinatal infants.

Materials and methods

Patients

Two hundred pregnancies with comparable clinical conditions were prospectively recruited, and divided equally into four groups. The ICP group included those who had skin pruritus, jaundice, increased serum bile acid levels, and slightly elevated liver transaminase, in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of ICP; the HBV infection group was made up of 50 pregnancies with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) during pregnancy; the ICP with HBV group was composed of 50 pregnancies with ICP who had positive HBsAg, hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb); and the control group included 50 healthy pregnancies. The 200 pregnancies had all prenatal examinations and births in our hospital between January 2011 and February 2013 (age range: 21–40 years, median age: 27.7 years, median gestational week: 38.5 weeks). The general characteristics in the four groups made no statistically significant differences (P>0.05; Table 1).

Table 1 General clinical condition of the four groups

Groups	n	Weight (kg)	Age (years)	Gestational age (weeks)
Control	50	66.4±5.2	28.2±5.8	39.2±0.9
ICP	50	64.7±6.8	27.7±6.1	38.9±0.7
HBV	50	65.4±6.5	26.3±6.4	38.2±1.2
ICP with HBV	50	61.5±7.6	26.8±7.1	37.4±1.6

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Assessment method

We monitored the rates of fetal intrauterine distress, neonatal asphyxia, and birth defects. Fetal intrauterine distress was judged according to the clinical diagnosis. Generally, fetal intrauterine distress can be diagnosed in accordance with any of the following symptoms: the degree of contamination of the amniotic fluid reaching II–III degrees, fetal heart rate >160 bpm or <120 bpm during the intervals of uterine contraction (severely abnormal fetal heart rate is <100 bpm or >180 bpm), abnormal nonstress test (NST) baseline rate on electronic fetal monitor (including variation decreasing or disappearing, no reaction, decelerating in the late period, and frequent variable deceleration), and fetal movement fewer than three times per hour or fewer than half of the original number of movements after treatment.

Neonatal asphyxia was decided by Apgar scores, scores 4–7 and 0–3 were regarded as mild and severe asphyxia, respectively. PROM and MSAF, and cesarean section rate were calculated during and after childbirth, respectively.

Birth defects were defined as dysplasia and physical abnormalities of the fetuses that already existed in the womb before birth; these include two types: deformity and dysfunction. Some birth defects are visible when the baby is born, called abnormalities, such as cleft lip and palate (harelip), lack of hands and feet, polydactylism, etc; while some defects are invisible and revealed gradually throughout the children’s growth, such as simple mental retardation, phenylketonuria, progressive muscular dystrophy, etc.

HBV examination

The venous blood from the sick pregnant women was collected to detect HBV serum markers, including HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), HBeAg, hepatitis e antibody (HBeAb), and HbcAb in the Department of Clinical Laboratory. HBV markers were also examined in newborns suspected to be infected 24–48 hours after birth.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (v17.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was determined by Fisher’s exact probabilities, chi-square tests, and Student’s t-test according to the data type. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The influence of ICP with HBV infection on delivery method

As shown in Table 2, the occurrence rates of PROM and MSAF were higher in the infected groups than in the control group (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the ICP with HBV infection group and the other groups (P>0.05).

Table 2 Methods of childbirth in each group

Groups	n	PROM, MSAF	Cesarean section	Eutocia
Control	50	3 (6.0)	8 (16.0)	42 (84.0)
ICP	50	13 (26.0)*	37 (74.0)*	12 (24.0)
HBV	50	11 (22.0)**	16 (32.0)**	32 (64.0)
ICP with HBV	50	26 (52.0)***	47 (94.0)***	4 (8.0)

Notes: All numbers are n (%);

* P<0.05, ICP group vs control group;

** P<0.05, HBV group vs control group;

*** P<0.05, IPC with HBV group vs control group.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid; PROM, premature rupture of membranes.

The influence of ICP with HBV infection on HBV vertical transmission from mother to child

In Table 3, all the 50 newborns in the control group and 50 newborns in the ICP group were not HBV infected. Only ten of the 50 newborns in the HBV group were found to be HBV positive and the rate of HBV intrauterine infection was 10%. In the ICP with HBV infection group, 28 of the 50 newborns were HBV positive and the rate of intrauterine infection was 56%.

Table 3 The rates of HBV infection in infants

Groups	n	HBV infection
		(+)	(−)
Control	50	0 (0)	50 (100)
ICP	50	0 (0)	50 (100)
HBV	50	5 (10)	45 (90)
ICP with HBV	50	28 (56)*	22 (44)

Notes: All numbers are n (%);

* P<0.05, ICP with HBV group vs other groups.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

The relationship between ICP with HBV infection and fetal distress and neonatal asphyxia

As shown in Table 4, the rate of fetal distress in the ICP group, HBV group, and ICP with HBV infection group were 26% (13/50), 14% (7/50), and 60% (30/50), respectively. This rate was only 6% (3/50) in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, when ICP is combined with HBV infection, the occurrence of fetal distress increased significantly (P<0.05).

Table 4 The rate of fetal distress in the four groups

Groups	n	Rate of fetal distress
Control	50	3 (6)
ICP	50	13 (26)
HBV	50	7 (14)
ICP with HBV	50	30 (60)*

Notes: All numbers are n (%);

* P<0.05, ICP with HBV group vs other groups.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

The relationship between ICP with HBV infection and Apgar scores

The rates of neonatal asphyxia (Apgar score: 0–7) among the four groups are summed up in Table 5. Neonatal asphyxia in the ICP with HBV infection group was more severe than in the other three groups (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the ICP and HBV group on neonatal asphyxia, when compared with the control group (P>0.05).

Table 5 Infant Apgar scores in the four groups

Groups	n	Apgar scores
		0–3	4–7	>7
Control	50	0 (0)	2 (4)	48 (96)
ICP	50	2 (0)	4 (8)	44 (92)
HBV	50	1 (2)	6 (12)	43 (86)
ICP with HBV	50	10 (20)*	16 (32)*	24 (48)

Notes: All numbers are n (%);

* P<0.05, ICP with HBV group vs other groups.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

The influence of ICP with HBV infection on birth defect rate

In the ICP with HBV infection group, three newborn congenital abnormalities and five full-term neonates with low birth weight were found. The ICP group and the control group had one newborn congenital abnormality each. The HBV infection group had one full-term neonate with low birth weight. Thus, the occurrence rate of newborn congenital abnormalities and full-term neonates with low birth weight in the ICP with HBV infection group was apparently higher than that in the other three groups (Table 6; P<0.05).

Table 6 The rate of birth defects in the four groups

Groups	n	Rate of birth defect
Control	50	0 (0)
ICP	50	0 (0)
HBV	50	1 (2)
ICP with HBV	50	8 (16)*

Notes: All numbers are n (%);

* P<0.05, ICP with HBV group vs other groups.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Discussion

ICP is one of the most common diseases during the pregnancy, next to HBV infection. It mainly occurs in mid or late pregnancy and is caused by the abnormal metabolism of bile acid in the mother’s body.^10,11 ICP is a disease that can specifically lead to fetus or newborn diseases during the perinatal period. The biochemical characteristics of ICP are increased serum bile acid levels with mild abnormal aminotransferase, and increased bilirubin.^12–14 ICP is a transient benign symptom to most mothers, but to the fetus, it can lead to serious consequences, including preterm birth, asphyxia, and other severe consequences.¹⁵ In the People’s Republic of China, the HBsAg positive population is more than 90,000,000 individuals.¹⁶ Epidemiological investigations have shown that the rate of HBV in pregnant women is 10.2%; moreover, the positive rate of HBsAg among infected pregnancies can reach up to 20%–30%, and can even reach above 30% between the ages of 20–25 years in the mother. ICP with HBV infection often causes placental chorionic vascular lesions, leading to placenta function defects, aggravation of cholestasis, significant hypoxia, fetal distress, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth or stillbirth, and other severe negative effects; therefore, these pregnancies are regarded as high risk.¹⁶

Recent studies have shown that ICP is connected to heredity, immunity, and estrogen, as well as the environment, with the mechanism of action still unclear.¹⁷ The present study found no statistically significant difference on the delivery method between the ICP group, the HBV infection group, and the control group. However, in the ICP with HBV infection group, most of the pregnancies were HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBcAb positive, and PROM and MSAF were more apparent. Therefore, it is recommended for the mother to opt for a cesarean section. The finding that the delivery method does not affect HBV vertical transmission from mothers to their infants has been confirmed in an expanded study examining over 300 individuals.⁴ Our study found that the transmission rate from mothers to their infants is 20%, in accordance with previous data (15.5%–23.0%).^4,12,16 However, ICP with HBV infection, especially when the HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBcAb were all positive, could severely affect the pregnancy and maternal and child health during the delivery. Moreover, HBV intrauterine infection rate reached 100% and infected infants would remain infected with the virus, with an apparently increasing occurrence rate of chronic hepatitis, and cirrhosis and cancer of the liver. Most HBV infection pregnancies have no clinical symptoms, or abnormal hepatic or coagulation functions. It has little influence on fetal growth in the uterus. However, HBV infection often occurs in late pregnancy, making it easier to result in PROM and MSAF, especially in the ICP and HBsAg positive pregnancies.

Some studies have suggested that the placental barrier can partially block HBV, while the fetal infection rate of HBsAg positive carriers is 67.21% (46 out of 61).¹⁸ Another study found that HBV infection of villi capillary endothelial cells is closely related to HBV intrauterine infection.¹⁹ HBV-infected placentas are more likely to have vascular lesions in the chorion, including swelling of the endothelial cells, lumen narrowing, and fibrinoid necrosis of the basement membrane.¹⁹ Placental lesions easily cause fetal distress and fetal anoxia suffocation.²⁰ Our results showed that, in the ICP and HBV infection groups, fetal distress and neonatal asphyxia rates were higher in than the control group, while the ICP with HBV infection group had the highest incidence rates, with the difference being statistically significant from the other groups. Some researchers think that mother-to-child transmission of HBV can increase the occurrence of fetal distress and ICP in pregnancy;²¹ our study is not large enough to draw conclusions on whether HBV infection increases ICP or whether ICP can promote HBV infection recurrence or aggravate HBV infection symptoms. Some researchers believe that deposition of bile acid can increase HBV replication and metabolic disturbance, which could aggravate or induce HBV infection.²² In addition, one recent study confirmed that the HBV or hepatitis delta virus membrane receptor is bile acid of sodium/taurocholic acid transporters Na⁺-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP).²³ In conclusion, we propose that ICP with HBV infection increases intrahepatic metabolism disorder and is the preliminary cause of intrauterine hypoxia and bile acid toxicity; on the other hand, it can cause deposition of bile acid activated aggravate or cause HBV infection, placental chorionic vascular damage, and affect placental function and change its permeability. HBV spreads easily intrauterinally. In addition, the virus and cholic acid factors can aggravate intrauterine hypoxia and cholestasis, causing fetal maladjustment, fetal intrauterine distress, and even suffocation.

Although this study showed that the incidence of birth defects in the ICP with HBV group was higher than in the control group, we could not conclude that ICP with HBV infection is the primary cause since many factors can cause birth defects, which cannot be ruled out in the present study.

Therefore, based on our observations, we hold the opinion that ICP with HBV infection not only has serious effects on the newborn, but also aggravates ICP and virus infection symptoms in mothers. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the examination of liver function and fetal intrauterine monitoring during the pregnancy and delivery. Active treatment to prevent neonatal asphyxia and HBV infection should be considered.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.