Congenital anomaly of the inferior vena cava and factor V Leiden mutation predisposing to deep vein thrombosis

Abstract

A previously healthy 21-year-old man presented with back pain, bilateral extremity pain, and right lower extremity weakness, paresthesias, and swelling. Sonographic examination revealed diffuse deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the femoral and popliteal venous system. CT imaging revealed hypoplasia of the hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) segment with formation of multiple varices and collateral veins around the kidneys. Hematologic workup also discovered a factor V Leiden mutation, further predisposing the patient to DVT. The rare, often overlooked occurrence of attenuated IVC, especially in the setting of hypercoagulable state, can predispose patients to significant thrombosis.

Video abstract

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

http://dvpr.es/1C7WbuT

Keywords:

• inferior vena cava (IVC)
• deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
• lower extremities
• thrombophilic
• venography

Introduction

Congenital inferior vena cava (IVC) anomalies are an unusual and often underreported and asymptomatic finding that may predispose patients to deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The most common causes of IVC obstruction are malignant neoplasms and IVC thrombosis.^1–3 Formation of the IVC occurs during weeks 6 through 8 of embryogenesis. The IVC is formed by continuous formation and regression of three paired embryonic veins: the posterior cardinal, subcardinal, and the supracardinal veins. IVC anomalies occur when there is an abnormal regression or persistence of any of these embryonic veins.⁴ IVC anomalies have an estimated prevalence of 0.5%–0.6% in healthy individuals and 2% in those with congenital cardiac defects.⁵

Discovery of an anomalous IVC is typically an incidental finding during medical imaging, cardiac catheterization, or aortoiliac surgery.^4,6–11 While imaging is a reliable method to investigate IVC anomalies, most radiologists and clinicians may lack sufficient knowledge of these anomalies. This may lead to misdiagnosis in some circumstances.¹²

Results

A previously healthy 21-year-old male presented with a 1-week history of back pain and 1-day history of bilateral pain and lower extremity swelling. He also complained of accompanying feelings of numbness, tingling, and tightness in his right leg. His back pain acutely developed 1 week after vigorous weight-training squat exercises. His medical history is significant for an episode of pancreatitis. He was previously a social smoker and reported smoking 1–2 cigarettes on weekends for 3–4 years, but quit 4 months prior to presentation. His family medical history is significant for varicose veins in his grandmother.

On initial physical examination, his right leg was markedly more swollen and edematous than his left. A right lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasound documented diffuse acute thrombosis in the femoral and popliteal venous system. Acute thrombi were visualized in his greater saphenous, superficial femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial veins. Doppler ultrasound of the left leg revealed normal color and spectral flow in the common femoral, greater saphenous, superficial femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial veins without evidence of a filling defect or compressibility. A spiral chest CT scan with contrast was performed, which ruled out an acute pulmonary embolism (Figure 1). The CT scan documented attenuation of the hepatic IVC segment and multiple varices and collateral veins in the retroperitoneum around the kidneys, the expected location of the IVC, and collateral vessels in the left anterior chest wall (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 1 Chest CT with contrast. Azygos-hemiazygos (red arrows) and the hepatic portion of the IVC (yellow arrow).

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; IVC, inferior vena cava.

Figure 2 Hepatic IVC (circled).

Abbreviation: IVC, inferior vena cava.

Figure 3 CT scan with contrast.

Note: Extensive network of collaterals (circled).
Abbreviation: CT, computed tomography.

Consequently, a right lower extremity ascending venogram was performed via the right popliteal vein with the patient in prone position (Figure 4). The venogram confirmed Doppler imaging and the diagnosis of extensive venous thrombosis involving the right superficial femoral, common femoral, and right iliac veins. A thrombus was also noted involving the left iliac vein.

Figure 4 Lower extremity venogram. Interrupted IVC (yellow arrow) and lower extremity drained by hemiazygos veins (red arrow).

Abbreviation: IVC, inferior vena cava.

Laboratory findings were noncontributory, except for a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation found on thrombophilia workup.

The patient was treated with a catheter-assisted mechanical thrombectomy. The patient also received a power-pulse spray using 8 mg tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and an additional 2 mg TPA via the infusion catheter. Balloon maceration of the thrombus was performed using a 10 mm ×4 cm balloon catheter. The patient was effectively administered catheter-directed thrombolysis with TPA at 1 mg/hour over a 24-hour period. The patient was also administered heparin at a rate of 300 U/hour.

Postlytic venography confirmed successful thrombolysis of the right lower extremity veins and the presence of an anomalous IVC. Venography revealed the lower extremities were properly being drained by the azygos/hemiazygos venous system. The patient was anticoagulated and discharged home with recommendation for long-term warfarin therapy. The patient was also advised not to engage in vigorous lower extremity exercises.

Discussion

In the case of our patient, with an interrupted hepatic IVC, the anomaly results from the embryologic failure of the anastomosis of the subcardinal vein–hepatic segment. The hepatic veins converge to flow directly into the right atrium, and the lower extremity blood returns to the superior vena cava through the azygos/hemiazygos venous system.¹³

When treating patients with congenital IVC defects, it is important to recognize the anomaly as a risk factor for DVT. The estimated prevalence of DVT in patients under 30 years of age with absent IVC is 5% versus 0.5%–0.6% in the general healthy population.^14,15 Ultrasound, the standard diagnostic test for DVT, does not accurately visualize the abdominal veins, since they cannot be accurately compressed.^14–16 When younger patients present with idiopathic DVT, in the absence of clotting defects or factors known to predispose individuals to thrombophilia, clinicians must consider an underlying IVC anomaly as the cause for DVT development.^5,14 Our patient is an interesting case because he had both a clotting disorder and an IVC anomaly, which provided a challenge when discerning the exact etiology of his symptoms. The presence of both factors likely contributed to our patient’s thrombotic event. However, there has yet to be substantial research to uncover the precise nature of such a relationship. The presence of both an IVC anomaly and clotting disorder warranted the patient’s requirement of long-term anticoagulation following thrombolysis to prevent recurrent DVT and sequelae. Elastic stockings have frequently been reported as adjuvant therapy to prevent stasis ulcers and venous insufficiency.¹⁷ Our patient’s symptoms appeared only after strenuous activity and he had no previous history of symptoms indicative of DVT or venous insufficiency. Therefore, we did not feel elastic stockings needed to be utilized at this time given the resolution of his symptoms following thrombolysis. The patient was advised to maintain close follow-up and that elastic stockings may be used in the future should they be warranted.

Our patient also presented with neurological symptoms that could not solely be attributed to the presence of DVT. Epidural vein enlargement due to IVC anomalies is a rare but well-documented pathological process that can result in nerve root compression syndrome.^18–21 It is likely that our patient also experienced some degree of nerve compression or irritation due to epidural vein expansion. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – the imaging modality necessary for evaluation – was not performed. When patients present with symptoms of nerve root compression, sciatica, exercise-induced numbness, or lower back pain with no other pathologic explanation, full radiologic workup is used to assess epidural varicosis secondary to IVC anomalies – particularly if patients also present with symptoms of DVT.

Ruggeri et al¹⁴ suggest the development of DVTs may be due to the inadequate drainage of the lower limbs by the compensating azygos venous system despite enlargement of the vessels. IVC anomalies also predispose patients to DVT at an earlier age. Obernosterer et al²² found patients with anomalies of the IVC presenting with DVT were significantly younger (25±6 years) than those without (53±19 years; P=0.002). As in the case of our patient, strenuous activity has been documented as a precipitating factor in DVT formation in young, otherwise healthy individuals with an IVC anomaly.^6,22–24 Therefore, patients with a diagnosed IVC anomaly should be advised against excessive exercise or demanding physical activity. We hypothesize that the relationship between arduous physical activity and DVT in patients with IVC anomalies may not be established as a direct causal one. However, frequent stretching of the IVC could possibly result in endothelial damage and postinflammatory stenosis of the IVC, potentially rendering it susceptible to the development of thrombosis. It has also been suggested that collaterals developed in patients with IVC anomalies provide insufficient venous drainage during times of increased blood flow, such as arduous physical activity.¹⁷ We suggest the combination of postinflammatory stenosis due to recurring IVC stretching and stasis due to inadequate collateral drainage aided in creating a milieu conducive to thrombus formation. However, more research must be conducted to determine the exact pathophysiological mechanism of action.

In those patients found to have an IVC anomaly, clinicians must also evaluate patients for renal hypoplasia or horseshoe kidney. Gayer et al²⁵ identified nine patients with complete absence of the IVC and a hypoplastic right kidney. While right renal hypoplasia is more commonly associated with IVC anomalies, there has been one previous report of left renal hypoplasia and aberrant IVC.²⁶ Van Veen et al²⁶ has proposed the clinical constellation of kidney and IVC abnormalities with associated DVT to be named kidney IVC abnormalities leg thromboses (KILT) syndrome.

Conclusion

Since an anomalous IVC cannot be detected by ultrasonography, the ideal imaging modality is using CT with contrast, MRI, or venography. Clinicians should suspect and rule out IVC anomalies if a patient presents with lower limb venous stasis, chronic venous hypertension in the lower extremities, and thrombosis. The diagnosis can also be supported if the intrathoracic hemiazygos or azygos systems are dilated.¹⁶

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported with the resources and the use of facilities at Coney Island Hospital.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.