Current perspectives on the role of IL-17 in autoimmune disease

Abstract

Until recently, autoimmune diseases had been categorized as either Th1- or Th2-mediated diseases. However, the discovery of a novel subset of helper T cells producing interleukin (IL)-17, ie, Th17 cells, changed this paradigm. Currently, IL-17 and Th17 cells are implicated in many autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Such conclusions were initially drawn from observations in animal models of autoimmune diseases, and accumulating data from clinical research also support the involvement of IL-17 in human diseases as well. Reagents targeting Th17-related molecules have been under clinical investigation for some diseases but have not always been effective in controlling disease activity. Consistent with this, it has become evident that there are substantial differences in the development of Th17 cells and in the way they function in autoimmune diseases between humans and experimental animals. Thus, further investigation is needed before we can draw any conclusions about the importance of IL-17 and Th17 cells in human autoimmune diseases.

Keywords:

• IL-17
• Th17
• rheumatoid arthritis
• multiple sclerosis
• Crohn’s disease
• psoriasis

Introduction

The introduction of biologicals for treatment of autoimmune disorders has dramatically changed the prognosis of these diseases. However, there are patients who are refractory to this treatment, and the frequency of patients who achieve drug-free remission is very low. This might indicate limitation of the current therapy targeting nonspecific inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα). Therefore, development of a novel treatment strategy targeting molecules or cells that are closer to the etiology of autoimmune diseases is desired. Until recently, it was widely accepted that autoimmune diseases are categorized as Th1- or Th2-mediated diseases. The former includes Crohn’s disease (CD), psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and multiple sclerosis (MS), while the latter includes asthma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the Th1/Th2 paradigm of autoimmune diseases included substantial discrepancies and was questioned by the discovery of a novel helper T cell subset, ie, Th17 cells, producing interleukin (IL)-17, firstly in mice, and a couple of years later in humans. Currently, many autoimmune diseases are believed to be Th17-mediated diseases, because the biologic functions of IL-17 are consistent with the chronic and destructive nature of inflammation. This review introduces accumulating evidence on the roles of IL-17 and Th17 cells in human autoimmune diseases.

Biology of IL-17

IL-17 (IL-17A) was discovered in 1993 originally as a rodent T cell cDNA transcript, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 8 (CTLA8).¹ Human IL-17 was subsequently identified. ² To date, five additional members of the IL-17 family have been identified and termed IL-17B, C, D, E, and F. IL-17F is most closely related to IL-17, and can form a heterodimer with IL-17, while IL-17E, also named IL-25, is instead classified as a Th2 cytokine.³ There are five receptors for the IL-17 family of cytokines, ie, IL-17RA, RB, RC, RD, and RE, of which IL-17RA and RC mediate the biologic activity of IL-17. While IL-17 is produced mainly by T cells, its receptor is expressed ubiquitously on various cell types, including myeloid cells, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts. Therefore, IL-17 exerts various biologic functions in vivo, which might be involved in the pathogenesis of a wide range of inflammatory disorders, as well as infectious conditions (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Effects of IL-17 signaling on host defense, inflammation, and tissue destruction.

Abbreviations: BBB, blood-brain barrier; G-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor; GM-CSF granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; VE GF, vascular endothelial growth factor; MMPs, metalloproteinases; PGE₂, prostaglandin E₂; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

One of the well-defined functions of IL-17 is mobilization of neutrophils, which is mediated by the production of CXC chemokines, including IL-8 (CXCL8) and growth-regulated oncogene-alpha (GROα, CXCL1), and growth factors, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), from epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells, as well as fibroblasts.^3,4 In fact, murine models of infection showed the involvement of IL-17 in neutrophil-mediated host defense against extracellular bacteria and fungi, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans.⁵ A role for IL-17 in mycobacterial infection, in which macrophage activation is important for host defense, was also reported. Furthermore, IL-17 participates in the elimination of pathogens by inducing antimicrobial peptides, such as β-defensins, especially in cooperation with IL-22.⁶ Some studies suggest the role of IL-17 in human host defense mechanisms as well. Acosta-Rodriguez showed that human memory T cells specific for C. albicans produced IL-17.⁷ Patients with hyper-IgE syndrome, who are defective in IL-17 production, are susceptible to bacterial and fungal infections.⁸

IL-17 exerts various biologic activities, which potentially cause tissue destruction and degeneration during chronic inflammation. IL-17 stimulates macrophages to produce various inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNFα.⁹ Furthermore, IL-17 acts synergistically with TNFα in IL-6 and GM-CSF production from fibroblasts.⁴ Of particular importance in the pathogenesis of RA is that IL-17 induces cartilage destruction via induction of metalloproteinases and inhibition of proteoglycan synthesis. IL-17 induces expression of RANKL on osteoblasts that mediates osteoclastogenesis, leading to bone destruction in RA.^10,11 Regarding intestinal inflammation, IL-17 stimulated metalloproteinase, IL-6, and IL-8 production from cultured colonic subepithelial myofibroblasts.¹² IL-17 also upregulates production of GM-CSF, IL-6, and GRO-α from keratinocytes.¹³ In the central nervous system, IL-17 was shown to disrupt the blood-brain barrier tight junction, which facilitated local migration of CD4 T cells.¹⁴ All these findings suggest an involvement of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases affecting a number of tissues.

Th17 cells

As is the case for most T cell-derived effector cytokines, an initial study demonstrated IL-17 production by CD45RO+ memory T cells.⁴ Subsequently IL-17 was shown to be produced by Th1, Th0, and even Th2 cell clones.^13,15 However, later studies in mice demonstrated by flow cytometric analysis of intracellular cytokine staining that IL-17-producing cells are characterized as a subset of helper T cells, which do not produce interferon gamma (IFNγ) or IL-4, the development of which was negatively regulated by IFNγ and IL-4, which are prototypic cytokines of Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively.³ Thus, IL-17-producing CD4 T cells, which have been identified as a novel helper CD4 T cell subset distinct from Th1 and Th2 cells, were subsequently named Th17 cells. Identification of human Th17 cells was also reported a couple of years later.^7,16

Since the discovery of Th17 cells, the molecular mechanisms for their differentiation have been extensively studied. Initial studies showed that IL-23, a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines that consists of the common IL-12/23p40 subunit and the unique IL-23p19 subunit, induced differentiation of mouse Th17 cells. However, it was later suggested that IL-23 is involved in the maintenance, expansion, and functional maturation of Th17 cells. On the other hand, it is now widely accepted that naive mouse CD4 T cells primed with antigenic stimulation in the presence of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) and IL-6 differentiate into Th17 cells. IL-21, which is produced by Th17 cells, can substitute for IL-6 in the differentiation of Th17 cells in an autocrine manner. ³ Resulting downstream signaling events that include activation of STAT3, induce the expression of RORγt and RORα, the master regulators of Th17 differentiation.¹⁷ Human Th17 cells also express the human ortholog of murine RORγt, RORC2.¹⁸ T cells in patients with mutated STAT3 are unable to differentiate into Th17 cells.⁸ However, there seem to be substantial differences in the signal requirement for the differentiation of mouse and human Th17 cells. In mice, IL-23 does not directly induce the differentiation of Th17 cells. However, IL-23, in combination with IL-1β, was repeatedly reported to play central roles in the differentiation of human Th17 cells, while the requirement for TGFβ in human Th17 differentiation is still controversial.³ Different sensitivity to TGFβ in the serum used for in vitro culture and different cellular sources used for the experiments are possible explanations for this discrepancy. Alternatively, TGFβ indirectly promotes Th17 development by inhibiting Th1 responses.¹⁹ Interestingly, human Th17 cells were demonstrated to originate from CD161+ cells.²⁰ CD161 is the human homolog of NK1.1 in mice. However, neither mouse Th17 cells nor IL-17-producing invariant NKT cells express NK1.1.²¹ Thus, there are substantial differences between human and mouse Th17 cells.

Expression of CCR6 is a common feature of mouse and human Th17 cells,^7,16,22 although it should be kept in mind that not all CCR6-positive cells are Th17 cells. Th17 cells migrate toward CCL20, the ligand for CCR6, but also secrete CCL20. Therefore, there might be a positive feedback loop of chronic accumulation of Th17 cells once inflammation is provoked. Th17 cells produce several kinds of inflammatory cytokines in addition to IL-17 and IL-17F, which include TNFα and IL-6, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-26. It is worth noting that not only IL-6 and TNFα, but also other cytokines, can be produced by other subsets of CD4 T cells. For example, IL-21 is more likely a product of follicular helper T cells, which can be derived from Th1 and Th2 cells as well.²³ In addition, not all IL-17-producing cells are positive for IL-21. Similarly, a large part of the IL-22-producing cell population does not belong to Th17 cells and is regarded as another independent subset of helper T cells, denoted as Th22 cells.²⁴ Nevertheless, it is important to note that IL-22 and IL-17 cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides.⁶ IL-22 is known to induce hyperplasia of keratinocytes involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis (see below). IL-23 is also involved in IL-22 production. Thus, there are functional similarities between IL-17 and IL-22-producing T cells. As mentioned previously, IFNγ suppresses the differentiation of Th17 cells in vitro. However, presence of CD4 T cells producing both IL-17 and IFNγ has also been noted, especially in humans. Their origin and functions are not clarified yet, but phenotypic plasticity of Th17 to Th1 cells by IL-12-signaling has been demonstrated.¹⁶

In addition to Th17 cells, other subset of T cells, including CD8 T, NK T, and TCRγδ T cells, have been demonstrated to produce IL-17 in mice. Even non-T cells, such as neutrophils and lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells, can also be an innate source of IL-17.²⁵ Among them, γδ T cells are the most well known as an important source of in vivo IL-17 production in some circumstances, not limited to infection conditions,⁵ but even in autoimmune diseases.^26,27 IL-17 production by γδ T cells as well as other populations of non-Th17 cells has also been reported in human, but its importance has yet to be determined.

Implication of IL-17 and Th17 cells in autoimmune diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases

CD and UC are the two major inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Although CD and UC share some features, there are clear differences in the areas of involvement as well as histology, which are at least in part explained by their different cytokine profiles. Thus, it has been widely accepted that CD and UC are Th1 and Th2 diseases, respectively. ²⁸ Accordingly, animal models of IBD have also been subdivided into Th1 and Th2 types as the models of CD and UC, respectively. However, the discovery of Th17 cells have provided novel insight into the pathogenesis of IBD. It was revealed that IL-23 is essential for the development of T cell-dependent IBD models, in which IBD is induced by transferring naive CD4 T cells into RAG-deficient mice or developed spontaneously in IL-10-deficient mice.^29,30 The latter is of particular interest, because it was recently reported that the CD-associated mutation of the NOD2 gene suppresses IL-10 transcription.³¹ Neutralization of IL-23 exerted a therapeutic effect on the development of experimental colitis.³² These findings suggest the involvement of Th17 cells in the development of IBD mouse models. However, a protective role of IL-17 was also reported in the naive CD4 T cell-transfer model of colitis,³³ although IL-17F might have opposite functions.³⁴ Thus, the disease-promoting effect of IL-23 might not necessarily mediate IL-17 or Th17 cells. Actually, it was observed that the lack of IL-23 also reduced Th1 responses, and that blocking IFNγ abrogated the development of the T cell transfer model of colitis.³⁵ Furthermore, IL-23 promoted even T cell-independent models of colitis.²⁹

Despite the controversies about the importance of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in IBD animal models, there have been reports showing overexpression of Th17-related molecules in human IBD lesions (see Table). IL-17 mRNA was expressed in inflamed colonic tissue from CD or UC.³⁶ Expression of IL-17 in the intestine of CD and UC was also demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, in which highest levels of expression were detected in the active CD lesion.³⁷ Expression of IL-23p19 was increased in inflamed mucosa.^38,39 There are studies addressing other Th17-related cytokines. IL-22 was shown to be overexpressed in inflamed mucosa and serum of CD patients.^40,41 IL-17F mRNA was also expressed at a higher level especially in UC.⁴² An involvement of IL-23- signaling in the pathogenesis of IBD was also suggested by its genetic association with IL23R polymorphisms.⁴³ Genetic associations of CD with Tyk2 and STAT3, both of which are involved in IL-23-signaling, were also shown in a Japanese population.⁴⁴

Table 1 Expression pattern of IL-17 and IL-23 transcripts in lesional tissue samples

	IL-17	IL-23p19	IL-12/23p40	Study (Ref)
IBD	+	+	±	Neilsen et al^Citation36 Fujino et al^Citation37 Schmidt et al^Citation38 Holtta et al^Citation39 Kobayashi et al^Citation47
Psoriasis	+	+	+	Teunissen et al^Citation50 Lowes et al^Citation51 Chan et al^Citation52 Wilson et al^Citation53 Piskin et al^Citation58 Zaba et al^Citation129
RA	−/+	+	−/±	Chabaud et al^Citation77 Kirkham et al^Citation85 Stamp et al^Citation86 Hillyer et al^Citation87 Kohno et al^Citation88 Brentano^Citation94
MS	+	+	+	Lock et al^Citation104 Li et al^Citation110

Abbreviations: IBS, irritable bowel syndrome, RA, rheumatoid arthritis; ref, reference; MS, multiple sclerosis.

Human Th17 cells were first reported using samples from IBD patients, and there was an increase of IL-17+ cells in the gut of CD patients.¹⁶ Notably, many IL-17-producing T cells in the gut also produced IFNγ (about 40%). CD161+ Th17 cells are enriched in the lamina propria, even in healthy subjects, with a further increase in CD lesions.⁴⁵ The percentage of IL-17-producing cells in CD161 + CD4 T cells in the peripheral blood also increased in CD patients. Interestingly, it was reported earlier that CD4 T cells in UC were enriched with IL-13-producing cells, which expressed CD161.⁴⁶ Unfortunately, IL-17 production by CD161 + CD4 T cells was not expected at that time and therefore was not examined. Kobayashi et al demonstrated an increased frequency of Th17 cells in the lamina propria compared with peripheral blood.⁴⁷ Lamina propria CD4 T cells in UC produced more IL-17 than those in CD, while IFNγ production was higher in CD than in UC. The addition of IL-23 augmented both IL-17 and IFNγ production of LP CD4 T cells in vitro. It was also reported that the percentage of IL-17- and IFNγ-producing cells was higher in T cells in IBD lesions compared with control samples, but there was no difference between CD and UC.⁴⁸ The number of macrophages secreting IL-23, TNFα, and IL-6 increased in CD, and they affected IFNγ, but not IL-17, production of lamina propria mononuclear cells, suggesting the presence of an IL-23/IFNγ axis in the pathogenesis of CD.⁴⁹ Therefore, although the relative importance of Th17 cells in human CD and UC is still unclear, IL-23 likely plays a critical role in the pathogenesis, which is now proved by the results of clinical trials described later in this paper.

Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterized by epidermal hyperplasia, dermal angiogenesis, and inflammatory cell infiltrates. Psoriasis had been generally regarded as a Th1 disease, but recent data suggest the involvement of Th17 responses. Expression of IL-17 mRNA was detected in biopsies from lesional psoriatic skin.^50–53 Serum levels of IL-17 correlated with disease severity.⁵⁴ Th17 cells were detected in inflamed skin,^51,53 although an increase of Th1 cells was also observed.⁵⁵ The accumulation of Th17 cells in psoriatic skin could be anticipated, because it was reported even before the discovery of Th17 that expression of CCL20 was upregulated in psoriatic skin, and skin-homing T cells express its receptor, CCR6.⁵⁶ Keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, microvascular endothelial cells, and dendritic cells produce CCL20. As mentioned above, CCL20 is also produced by Th17 cells, which might account for the chronicity of the disease.

Upregulation of IL-23 in psoriatic lesions was also repeatedly reported. Increased expression of IL-23p19 and IL-12/ IL-23p40 was noted in the lesional skin of psoriasis patients.^52,57,58 Similar to IBD, association of the disease with the IL23R gene polymorphism was demonstrated.^59,60 The importance of IL-23 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis is also supported experimentally. Intradermal injection of IL-23 in mice induced psoriasis-like lesions with epidermal hyperplasia and inflammatory cellular infiltrate.⁵² Notably, TNFα, but not IL-17, was required for the response. It was later revealed that IL-22 mediates the IL-23-induced dermal pathology.⁶¹ Ma et al also demonstrated the requirement of IL-22 in another psoriasis model, which was induced by transferring naive CD4 T cells into scid/scid mice.⁶² The IL-22 receptor was not expressed on immune cells but rather on epithelial keratinocytes, in which IL-22 induced expression of antimicrobial peptides.⁶³ IL-22 also regulates migration, proliferation, and differentiation of keratinocytes, suggesting roles of IL-22 in wound healing as well as skin inflammation.⁶⁴ Furthermore, injecting IL-22 directly into the skin induced expression of antimicrobial peptide, and inflammatory cytokines and keratinocyte hyperplasia.⁶² In agreement with these findings, serum IL-22 levels increased in psoriasis patients and were correlated with disease severity.⁶⁵ Local IL-22 expression increased in psoriatic lesions and was associated with increased expression of metalloproteinases and antimicrobial peptides.^53,63,65 Although Th17 cells can produce IL-22,^6,61 IL-22 production by another independent subset of helper T cells in psoriatic lesions was recently reported by several groups.^24,66,67 These IL-22-producing cells produce neither IL-17 nor IFNγ, but share similarities with Th17 cells in the expression pattern of chemokine receptors. However, their detailed characteristics and functions are yet to be analyzed. These findings suggest the importance of IL-23 and IL-22, possibly more than IL-17, in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. It is also suggested that IL-17 and IL-22 have a distinct function in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, ie, IL-22 regulates keratinocyte differentiation, while IL-17 is more related to inflammation.⁶⁸

Rheumatoid arthritis

RA is characterized by chronic inflammation of systemic synovial tissue, which leads to joint destruction. The well known disease association with major histocompatibility complex Class II genes and infiltration of CD4 T cells in synovial tissue implies that activation of autoreactive CD4 T cells drives chronic inflammation. The requirement of CD4 T cells for the development of arthritis in animal models also supports the idea. Massive infiltration of activated macrophages in RA synovium suggests the involvement of Th1 cells, which are well known to activate macrophages in the host defense against intracellular pathogens. Expression of Th1 cytokines in RA joints was also demonstrated.⁶⁹ However, there has also been some data conflicting with the Th1 hypothesis, ie, mice blocking IFNγ-signaling were more susceptible to arthritis.⁷⁰ Nevertheless, disease resistance of IL-12-deficient mice strongly argues in favor of the importance of Th1. However, it was later revealed that IL-23, which shares the p40 subunit with IL-12, but not IL-12, was required for the development of collagen-induced arthritis in an animal model of RA.⁷¹ Preserved IFNγ and defective IL-17 production in IL-23p19-deficient mice suggested the importance of IL-17 in the development of the disease. This was supported by findings that mice lacking IL-17 and mice in which IL-17 was blocked were less susceptible to collagen-induced arthritis.^72–74 Thereafter, the importance of IL-17 was demonstrated in many, if not all, animal models of arthritis, including spontaneous arthritis in IL-1Rα-deficient mice and the SKG strain of mice.^75,76 These results suggest that Th17 cells are the pathogenic CD4 T cells driving chronic inflammation in human RA.

There have been numerous studies examining IL-17 production in human RA. The first report by Chabaud et al detected bioactive IL-17 in the culture supernatants of synovial cells.⁷⁷ Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated IL-17-positive cells in RA synovium, which accounted for about 1% of T cells. Consistent with this, a recent study demonstrated that the majority of IL-17-producing cells in RA synovium were mast cells, while there were relatively few IL-17-producing T cells.⁷⁸ An earlier study, in which the concentration of IL-17 was measured by using polyclonal antibodies against IL-17, showed very high levels of IL-17 in RA synovial fluid (SF) and serum.⁷⁹ Although more recent studies also showed increased IL-17 production in RA SF compared with osteoarthritis SF,^11,22,80,81 the levels were not as high as in the earlier report. Furthermore, a considerable portion of RA SF did not contain a detectable amount of IL-17. The concentration of IL-17 was even comparable between RA and osteoarthritis SF, but was increased in reactive arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.^82,83 Raza et al reported that IL-17 production increased in the SF of early but not established RA.⁸⁴ There are also several reports examining the expression of IL-17 transcripts in RA synovial membrane. Kirkham et al reported that increased levels of IL-17 mRNA expression predicted progression of joint damage,⁸⁵ which fits well with the known biologic activity of IL-17. However, IL-17 mRNA was only detected in 15 of 54 RA patients, whereas IFNγ mRNA was detected in 48 of 56 patients. Others also detected IL-17 mRNA in only about half of RA samples.^86,87 No difference was found in the expression level of IL-17 mRNA between RA and osteoarthritis by qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. ⁸⁸ These findings are supported by studies examining the prevalence of Th17 cells by flow cytometry. The frequency of Th17 cells found in the peripheral blood of RA patients did not differ from controls,^89,90 but was significantly increased in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, Th1 cells predominated over Th17 cells in the joints,^26,89 although the percentage of Th17 in CD4 T cells can be higher in joints than in blood, possibly due to the enrichment of CD45RO+ memory CD4 T cells. This is supported by earlier reports showing no increase of CCR6 expression in memory CD 4T cells in RA joints.⁹¹ In contrast with these findings, a recent report showed an increased proportion of Th17 cells in the peripheral blood of disease-modifying antirheumatic-drug naive RA patients.⁹² Together with the report by Raza et al this suggests the importance of Th17 at an early stage of the disease.⁸⁴ A significant decrease of serum IL-17 after the onset of RA was also recently reported.⁹³

Although IL-23 is even more important than IL-17 for the development of animal models of arthritis, expression of IL-23 is not easily detected in RA. It was reported that the level of IL-23 protein in RA and osteoarthritis SF was comparably low, mainly due to defective IL-12/23p40 expression.⁹⁴ Stamp et al detected a low level of expression of IL-23p19 in RA synovial membrane, which was higher in the samples with IL-17 expression (13 of 25).⁸⁶ Therefore, unlike the case of CD or psoriatic lesions, IL-23 and IL-17 might not always be upregulated in RA synovium. In addition, it was reported that CD and psoriasis-associated variants of the IL23R gene are not associated with RA.^95,96 Of particular interest is the observation made by Hillyer et al that the addition of anti- IL-23 monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the synovial cell culture only partly reduced IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-6 production.⁸⁷ Furthermore, the effect of anti-IL-17 mAb was even weaker than anti-IL-23 mAb. These results were clearly different from what was shown two decades ago, ie, blocking TNFα in a similar culture system completely suppressed inflammatory cytokine production.⁹⁷ Therefore, the importance of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of human RA could differ from that in animal models and remains an open question.

Multiple sclerosis

MS is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is a prototype of T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Thus, EAE is induced by either active immunization with myelin antigen or by adoptive transfer of myelin antigen-primed T cells, which enables us to address T cell functions easily. In fact, the importance of IL-23 in autoimmune inflammation was first demonstrated in this model,⁹⁸ which led to the discovery of Th17 cells. However, the importance of the Th1 response in the pathogenesis of EAE was reevaluated more recently. While adoptive transfer of myelin-specific Th17 cells induced EAE characterized by neutrophil infiltration, Th1 cells transferred EAE with a macrophage-rich infiltrate.⁹⁹ Expression of T-bet, irrespective of Th1 or Th17, was important for encephalitogenicity.¹⁰⁰ Furthermore, it was shown that IL-17, IL-17F, and IL-22 were dispensable for the development of EAE,^101,102 although there are also conflicting results.³⁴ Thus, both Th1 and Th17 cells can be pathogenic in EAE.

Relatively few data are available on the involvement of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of human MS compared with mouse EAE or other human diseases, likely due to the difficulty in obtaining lesion samples. An increased frequency of mononuclear cells expressing IL-17 mRNA in the blood and spinal fluid of MS patients was reported.¹⁰³ Transcriptional profiling of the genes expressed in MS lesions also demonstrated upregulation of IL-6 and IL-17.¹⁰⁴ Ishizu et al reported increased levels of IL-17 and IL-8 in the spinal fluid of patients with the opticospinal form of MS, in which neutrophil infiltration is more prominent than in conventional MS.¹⁰⁵ The frequency of Th17 cells but not Th1 cells in the peripheral blood was significantly increased in active MS patients.¹⁰⁶ In another report, the frequency of Th17 cells in the spinal fluid, but not in peripheral blood, was increased during relapse.¹⁰⁷ Histologic analysis also showed expression of IL-17 in active lesions.¹⁰⁸ As for IL-23, peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells from MS patients had increased expression of IL-23p19.¹⁰⁹ IL23p19 as well as IL-12/23p40 was also detected in active MS lesions.¹¹⁰ Although these results suggest the involvement of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of human MS, there have also been reports showing the predominance of Th1 cells in myelin- specific T cells.^111,112 The genetic association of MS with IL23R polymorphism is controversial.^113–116 In addition, it was observed that exacerbations of MS in patients treated with altered peptide ligand were associated with an increased Th1 response.¹¹⁷ MS was also exacerbated in patients treated with IFNγ.¹¹⁸ Thus, similar to the case of mouse EAE, Th17 cells may not be the only pathogenic CD4 T cells in human MS.

Current therapies for autoimmune diseases and effect on IL-17 or Th17 cells

The treatment strategy and prognosis of autoimmune disease have greatly changed since the introduction of biologic agents, firstly anti-TNFα mAb for RA. Thereafter, anti-IL-6 and anti-CD20 mAbs and soluble CTLA4-Ig have been demonstrated to be highly effective in RA and are now available worldwide.¹¹⁹ TNFα blockers have also been used in the treatment of CD and psoriasis.^120,121 However, biological-based therapy is sometimes unsuccessful, even when a beneficial effect is expected. For example, blocking TNFα exerted deleterious effects on MS,¹²² although local TNFα production was shown to be increased in active MS,¹²³ and TNFα has various biologic activities that can explain the pathogenesis of MS.¹²⁴ In addition, blocking TNFα was effective in the animal model of MS and EAE,¹²⁵ and TNFα-deficient mice were less susceptible to EAE.¹²⁶ These findings remind us of an important lesson, ie, the pathogenesis of animal models and real human diseases are not necessarily identical.

There have been studies addressing the effects of current therapies on Th17 responses. Kageyama et al observed a significant decline in the level of IL-23 in the serum of RA patients after treatment with anti-TNFα mAb, which was significantly correlated with improved disease activity, although the level of IL-17 was unaffected.¹²⁷ Yue et al reported, however, that the percentage of Th17 cells in peripheral blood tended to decrease after treatment with another antibody against TNFα.¹²⁸ It was also shown in psoriasis patients that TNFα inhibition reduced local expression of Th17-related molecules, including IL-23, IL-22, IL-17, CCL20, and β-defensin 4.¹²⁹ These results suggest a downregulatory role of TNFα blockers on Th17 responses in vivo, either directly or indirectly as the result of reduced inflammation. A mAb against IL-6 receptor also effectively controls disease activity in RA.¹³⁰ Because IL-6 was shown to be involved in the development of Th17 cells, an animal study anticipated that Th17 cells are one of the targets of therapy.¹³¹ On the other hand, in vitro analysis of human T cells showed that IL-6 plays a relatively minor role in the development of Th17 cells.³ In this regard, it is of interest to see the effect of blocking IL-1β, because it plays a critical role in the differentiation of human Th17 cells. However, IL-1β blockade exerted only a modest effect in RA.¹³² In any case, the effects of IL-1β- or IL-6-targeted therapy on Th17 cells have not been reported so far. As for MS, IFNβ is widely used for its treatment, and some recent studies suggest the involvement of downregulation of Th17 responses. It was reported that Type I IFN receptor-deficient mice develop severe EAE with enhanced IL-17 production,¹³³ although conflicting data were also demonstrated. ¹³⁴ In vitro experiments showed that IFNβ inhibits human Th17 differentiation directly or indirectly via dendritic cells.¹³⁵ However, Drulovic et al reported that while IFNβ treatment reduced the level of IFNγ and T-bet, it did not affect the level of IL-17 and RORc expression,¹³⁶ again leaving a question about the importance of Th17 cells in MS.

Clinical trials of reagents targeting Th17-related molecules in autoimmune diseases

A clinical trial is the only way to prove the importance of a given target, because it sometimes has results which are unexpected from in vitro analysis or animal studies. It was revealed that administration of an anti-IL-12/23p40 mAb (ABT-874) showed a therapeutic effect in patients with CD, with no increase of adverse events.¹³⁷ Treatment with ABT- 874 decreased IFNγ, IL-12, IL-6, and TNFα secretion by mononuclear cells in the lamina propria. Impaired IL-17 production of lamina propria T cells was also reported later.¹³⁸ A randomized trial of ustekinumab (CNTO 1275), another antihuman IL-12/23p40 mAb, in 104 patients with moderate to severe CD also showed a significant effect, even in patients who had previously been given antiTNFα mAb.¹³⁹ In addition to these antibody-based drugs, a small oral dose of an IL-12/23 inhibitor, apilimod mesylate (STA 5326), was tested for CD.¹⁴⁰ The action of apilimod includes selective inhibition of c-Rel translocation, which results in the suppressed transcription of IL-12/23p40 and IL-12p35. The results of a clinical trial showed that apilimod was well tolerated and clearly effective in moderate to severe CD. Blocking IL-12/23p40 is also highly effective for the treatment of psoriasis.^141,142 For instance, a randomized, double-blind study revealed that ustekinumab was so effective that 66% of patients receiving 45 mg of ustekinumab but only 3% of patients receiving placebo achieved a 75% improvement of the psoriasis area and severity index.¹⁴³ Furthermore, it was recently reported that ustekinumab was even more effective than the soluble TNFα receptor, etanercept, for the treatment of psoriasis.¹⁴⁴ These results indicate that IL-12/23p40 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of CD and psoriasis. However, as these reagents do not only affect Th17 responses, possible involvement of IFNγ or Th1 responses in the pathogenesis is not excluded. It is also possible that IL-12 or IL-23 participate in the disease pathogenesis in a T cell-independent manner.

In contrast with the success in CD and psoriasis, a clinical trial of ustekinumab had disappointing results in MS. Up to 180 mg of ustekinumab was administered weekly until three weeks, and every four weeks thereafter. The number of new lesions was evaluated at week 23, but there was no reduction of lesions in the treatment group. Furthermore, there was no difference in the number of clinical or objective relapses.¹⁴⁵ One may argue that the treatment should be applied at an early stage of the disease. However, administration of anti- IL-12/23p40 mAb as well as anti-IL-23p19 mAb was effective in EAE even after onset.¹⁴⁶ Furthermore, the apparent clinical effect of blocking IL-12/23p40 in psoriasis and CD, irrespective of the duration of the disease, also argues against the idea. Therefore, it is more reasonable to assume that the pathology of MS, especially in the context of the cytokine network, is largely different from CD or psoriasis. This also reminds us of the different effect of TNFα blockade between MS and CD or psoriasis. As for RA, there has been no report of the therapeutic effect of targeting IL-12/23p40. However, the results of a Phase I trial of anti-IL-17 mAb (LY2439821) in the treatment of RA were recently published.¹⁴⁷ Although a certain degree of improvement of disease activity has been shown, the effect does not seem to be as strong as for TNFα blockers. However, it might be too early to draw conclusions, because of the small subject number and relatively high improvement rates in the placebo group. There is another anti-IL-17 mAb (AIN457) being tested for RA, but detailed results of the trial have not been published so far.¹¹⁹ In view of the biologic functions of IL-17, blocking IL-17 may exert a clearer beneficial effect in suppression of joint destruction during long-term follow-up. In this regard, future combination therapy including a TNFα blocker is of particular interest. To date, there has been no report of the effects of blocking IL-17 or other Th17-related cytokines in other human autoimmune diseases.

Conclusions

The discovery of IL-17 has led to novel insights into the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases, and the importance of IL-17 has been demonstrated in various animal models. However, it has become clear that there is a large variation in the therapeutic effect of targeting IL-17-related molecules in human autoimmune diseases. Further clinical trials might clarify the whole picture. At the same time, these findings also provoke the need for a better understanding of the differences between human and mouse immune systems, and for the development of better disease models, in order to avoid unnecessary clinical trials with their inevitable risk of adverse events.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflict of interest in this work.