57
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Using the tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine in the prevention of meningococcal disease

Pages 739-745 | Published online: 08 Aug 2008

Abstract

Invasive meningococcal disease occurs worldwide causing an estimated 50,000–135,000 deaths each year in addition to significant sequelae. In developed countries the disease is usually sporadic but outbreaks and epidemics, usually due to serogroups B and C, have occurred. In the US, an increasing number of cases are due to serogroup Y. In developing nations, epidemics due to serogroups A and more recently W-135, are common. The tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine to serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 (MCV4) has been demonstrated to be highly immunogenic and promote immune memory. This article will describe the rationale for the vaccine and its potential role to significantly decrease mortality and morbidity of meningococcal disease in those areas and populations at greatest risk from these serogroups.

Epidemiology and pathogenesis

Neisseria meningitidis is an aerobic, gram negative diplococcus that colonizes the nasopharynx of humans and is transmitted by respiratory tract droplets (CitationGardner 2006). Almost all human disease is caused by 5 of the 13 serogroups: A, B, C, Y, and W-135. Worldwide, approximately 500,000 cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) occur annually resulting in an estimated 50,000–135,000 deaths per year (CitationPollard 2004; CitationBorrow and Miller 2006). The incidence of the disease in developed countries varies from 0.5 to 1.1 per 100,000 people per year in the US (CitationGardner 2006) to 3.6 cases per 100,000 in England and Wales (CitationPollard 2004). In 2006, the estimated incidence of probable and confirmed IMD varied from 0.30 and 0.35 per 100,000 people in Italy and Hungary, respectively, to 4.96 and 8.90 per 100,000 in Ireland and Malta, respectively (CitationEU-IBIS 2006). In the US, over 98% of cases of IMD are sporadic (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005) but the disease is epidemic in many parts of the world.

The influence of serogroups in causing meningococcal disease varies according to year, geography, and, in some cases, ethnic and socioeconomic factors. Sero-groups B and C cause most cases of sporadic and rare epidemic disease in developed countries. Serogroups B, C, W-135, and Y comprised 61%, 32.2%, 3.2%, and 2.9% of meningococcal isolates, respectively, from IMD patients in the Czech Republic, Greece, and Norway (CitationYazdankhah et al 2004). Among IMD isolates, serogroup B predominated in Greece and Norway while serogroup C predominated in in the Czech Republic (CitationYazdankhah et al 2004). Serogroup A and recently W-135 cause most cases of epidemic disease in sub-Saharan Africa (almost 1000 cases per 100,000 population) (CitationPollard 2004). Serogroup W-135 meningococcal disease has been reported in pilgrims returning from the Hajj in Saudi Arabia and in their contacts (CitationMMWR 2001b; CitationHahne 2002). Serogroup Y accounted for only 2% of meningococcal disease in the US from 1988 to 1991 but accounted for 40% of cases during 2006, while serogroups B and C accounted for 28% and 27% during that year (CitationCDC 2007). In New Zealand, an epidemic of predominantly serogroup B meningococcal disease has recorded disease rates as high as approximately 500 per 100,000 in Pacific children less then 1 year of age compared with less then 50 per 100,000 children of European descent (CitationO’Hallahan et al 2004).

Invasive meningococcal disease usually occurs in persons who are seronegative and subsequently acquire N. meningitidis from crowding such as among military recruits and freshmen college students living in residence halls (CitationBruce et al 2001). The nasopharyngeal carriage rate of N. meningitidis has been shown to increase rapidly for first year university students living in residence halls (CitationNeal et al 2000). Exposure to tobacco smoke and alcohol-related behaviors are other potential risk factors for meningococcal disease in this population (CitationHarrison et al 1999).

Once N. meningitidis attaches to the nasopharyngeal mucosal cells, replicates, and establishes a carrier state, multiple factors determine the occurrence of IMD including the virulence of the organism and factors affecting host susceptibility (CitationGranoff 2004). The spleen is responsible for clearing meningococci from the blood and anatomic splenectomy has resulted in overwhelming meningococcal sepsis (CitationCondon et al 1994). Patients with functional hypo- or asplenia are also at increased risk for disease (CitationGranoff 2004). Deficiencies of terminal complement component, properdin, factor D, and mannan-binding lectin (MBL) have been associated with increased susceptibility to meningo-coccal infection (CitationPollard and Frasch 2001). The absence of serum bactericidal antibodies (SBAs) to human complement (hSBAs) to serogroup C meningococci, as demonstrated by a titer of less then 1:4, was associated with an increased risk of meningococcal disease in military recruits (CitationGoldschneider et al 1969a). It was later demonstrated that SBAs to rabbit complement (rSBAs) with a titer of less then 1:8 also predict susceptibility to meningococcal disease (CitationBorrow et al 2001). Conversely, a hSBA titer to serogroup C of ≥4 is considered protective while a rSBA titer of ≥8 is correlated with at least short-term protection (CitationBorrow et al 2005).

Burden of illness

Vieusseux in Switzerland first described epidemic meningococcal disease in 1805, but Weichselbaum first identified the bacterium in 1887 (CitationBarquet et al 1999; CitationRosenstein et al 2001). Meningitis occurs in about 50% of patients, and in older children and adults is accompanied by sudden headache, fever, stiff neck, and sometimes nausea, vomiting, and photophobia (CitationRosenstein et al 2001). In infants and very young children, fever, poor feeding, and lethargy may be seen initially while nuchal rigidity presents later in the course of the illness (CitationGranoff 2004). A rash is often present but may vary from maculopapular to the classic petechial or purpuric rash. Meningococcal sepsis or meningococcemia occurs in 5%–20% of IMD (CitationRosenstein et al 2001). It is characterized by sudden fever, petechial or purpuric rash, hypotension progressing to shock, acute adrenal hemorrhage (Waterhouse-Friederichsen syndrome), and multiorgan failure (CitationRosenstein, Perkins et al 2001). Other forms of IMD include pneumonia, arthritis, pericarditis, and cellulitis (Citationvan Deuren et al 2000).

The overall case-fatality rate for IMD in the US is approximately 9%–12%, even with appropriate antibiotic treatment, and that for meningococcemia is as high as 40% (CitationRosenstein et al 2001). However, the fatality rate can vary according to the affected population and the meningococcal serogroup. In New Zealand, the average case-fatality rate for serogroup B IMD is 4.3% (CitationO’Hallahan et al 2004). In a study of 295 cases of IMD in Maryland, USA from 1992 to 1999, persons ages 15–24 years old accounted for 24% of IMD cases and had a fatality rate of 23% compared with 4.6% of those younger than 15 years and 17% of those older than 24 years (CitationHarrison et al 2001). Of the 14 fatalities for which serogroup was known, serogroups C and Y accounted for 57% and 29%, respectively, of fatalities in this age group (CitationHarrison et al 2001). Consequently, more then 85% of these deaths were potentially preventable by the tetravalent (Groups A, C, Y, and W-135) meningococcal vaccines.

Invasive meningococcal disease may also cause sequelae such as hearing loss, neurologic deficits, or limb loss in up to 11%–19% of cases (CitationRosenstein et al 2001). A review of IMD in Barcelona from 1987 to 1992 found a sequelae rate of 8.2% for meningitis, 3.5% for meningococcemia with meningitis, and 1.5% for meningococcemia with an overall rate of 4% (CitationBarquet et al 1999). All patients who had neurologic sequelae had meningitis while meningococcemia was associated with sequelae such as limb amputation (CitationBarquet et al 1999).

Outbreaks of meningococcal disease

Household contacts of patients with IMD have a 500–800 times greater risk of meningococcal disease than the general rate and should be given chemoprophylaxis (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). They are candidates for immunization with meningococcal vaccine, but this does not substitute for chemoprophylaxis because of the time delay in developing immunity. Chemoprophylaxis should also be given to close contacts including child-care center contacts, anyone directly exposed to the patient’s oral or respiratory secretions, and passengers who sat on either side of the index-patient on a flight lasting >/= 8 hours (CitationMMWR 2001a; CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). Because systemic therapy other than ceftriaxone or other third-generation cephalosporin might not eradicate N. meningitidis from the nasopharynx, patients treated for IMD with other agents such as penicillin should also receive chemoprophylaxis (CitationAbramson and Spika 1985; CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). Chemoprophylaxis is ideally given within 24 hours of identification in the index patient and is of little value >14 days after disease onset (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). lists currently recommended antibiotic prophylaxis for meningococcal disease. Fluoroquinolone-resistant N. meningitidis has been reported in Argentina, Australia, China, France, India, Spain, and most recently in the northern US (CitationMMWR 2008). One study found azithromycin comparable in efficacy to rifampin in eradicating nasopharyngeal coverage of N. meningitis (CitationGirgis 1998). When fluoroquinolone-resistant meningococcal disease is identified, interim CDC recommendations are to give a single dose of 500 mg azithromycin for exposed persons ≥15 years old or 10 mg/kg body weight for those under 15 years old (CitationMMWR 2008).

Table 1 Chemoprophylactic agents for meningococcal disease

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) define outbreaks as three or more confirmed or probable cases of meningococcal disease in ≤3 months among persons residing in the same area who are not close contacts of each other with a primary disease attack rate of ≥10 cases/100,000 persons (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). In the circumstance of a confirmed outbreak, public health personnel should consider vaccinating the population at risk. Mass chemoprophylaxis is not recommended except for outbreaks involving populations in a limited setting such as school or for a serogroup B outbreak in those countries where a vaccine is not available (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005).

Meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines

Goldschneider and colleagues demonstrated that transplacental passage of antibodies to meningococci occurred resulting in passively acquired immunity to infection (CitationGoldschneider et al 1969b). In addition they found that military recruits developed bactericidal antibodies to their own meningococcal isolates as a response to their carrier state (CitationGoldschneider et al 1969b). Animal and human testing subsequently demonstrated that serogroups A and C polysaccharides stimulated immunogenicity (CitationGotschlich et al 1969). This led to the development of polysaccharide vaccines that were effective in preventing group C disease in US military recruits and controlling group A epidemics in Africa (CitationJodar et al 2002). The tetravalent polysaccharide vaccine to serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 (MPSV4, Menomune®-A,C,Y,W-135, SanofiPasteur, Inc., Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, US) was 85% efficacious in preventing group C meningococcal disease during an outbreak in Texas, USA (CitationRosenstein et al 1998).

The MPSV4 vaccine is T cell-independent and the sero-group C component is poorly immunogenic in children less then 18–24 months old while the serogroup A polysaccharide does not induce an immune response comparable to adults until ages 4–5 years (CitationMMWR 2000). In children less then 5 years, antibody levels to group A and C polysaccharides decrease significantly within 3 years after a single vaccine dose (CitationMMWR 2000). The vaccine also does not stimulate immune memory, and revaccination with serogroup C capsular polysaccharide vaccines often results in a hypo-responsive antibody response to group C polysaccharide in children and adults (CitationGranoff et al 1998; CitationMacDonald et al 1998; CitationDanzig 2004). It has been posited that repeated stimulation of B cells with the T-cell independent plain polysaccharide vaccine results in terminal differentiation of B cells to produce plasma cells and depletes the pool of specific B cells (CitationGranoff and Pollard 2007).

The serogroup B meningococcal polysaccharide is poorly immunogenic and the resulting IgG antibodies have poor complement bactericidal activity. In addition, the serogroup B capsular polysaccharide is structurally similar to a nerve cell molecule present in developing neural tissue and small amounts of adult tissue (CitationDanzig 2004). Vaccines for serogroup B that utilize the outer membrane vesicle (OMV) of N. meningitidis are under trial in a number of countries (CitationBorrow et al 2005). Their use is beyond the scope of this article.

The United Kingdom (UK) experience with conjugate meningococcal C vaccine

Polysaccharides conjugated to carrier proteins induce T-cell dependent immunity (CitationGranoff 2004). In November, 1999, the UK initiated a program to vaccinate all children with conjugate meningococcal C vaccine. Two vaccine brands used CRM197 as the carrier protein (Wyeth and Novartis, Canada, QC) and one used tetanus toxoid (Baxter Bioscience, IL, USA) (CitationBorrow and Miller 2006). The vaccine was given to infants at 2, 3, and 4 months of age, with a single dose catch-up to all children ages 1–18 years old and two doses for infants 5–11 months old (CitationBorrow and Miller 2006). These vaccines were demonstrated to be immunogenic and efficacious in infants, children, and adolescents. The number of cases of serogroup C IMD in adolescents 15–17 years old decreased by 76% from Jan 1 to Sept 30, 2000 compared with the corresponding period in 1999 and vaccine efficacy was estimated at 97% in teenagers (CitationRamsay et al 2001). Cases of serogroup C IMD in toddlers decreased by 34% during this period, but vaccine efficacy was estimated at 92% (CitationRamsay et al 2001). More than 1 year later, vaccine effectiveness decreased significantly in infants 2–4 months at initial immunization while effectiveness in older children and especially adolescents persisted (CitationTrotter et al 2004).

The nasopharyngeal carriage of meningococcal serogroup C bacteria in students aged 15–17 years was found to decrease by 66% 1 year later (CitationMaiden and Stuart 2002). The attack rate of serogroup C IMD subsequently decreased by 67% overall in unimmunized children and adolescents from July 2001 to June 2002 compared with July 1998 to June 1999 (CitationRamsay et al 2003). Consequently, there is evidence of herd immunity in unvaccinated members of the population or those in whom antibody levels have waned if a high enough proportion of the population is vaccinated.

Safety and efficacy of the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine

Three separate groups of 30 healthy US adults ages 18–55 years were given a single dose of tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine containing either 1, 4, or 10 μg of each capsular polysaccharide conjugated to diphtheria toxoid. Twenty-eight days after immunization, the percentage of recipients with SBA titers of ≥8 was 100%, 89%–100%, 88%, and 91% for serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135, respectively (CitationCampbell et al 2002). Mild to moderate local reactions such as injection site erythema and swelling occurred in over 50%–90% of subjects and in each dose group, 41%–50% reported at least one systemic reaction such as headache and malaise. One subject experienced severe pain, chills, and malaise with local tenderness and vomiting that resolved within 2 days (CitationCampbell et al 2002). Another study randomized over 800 adolescents (ages 11–18 years) to MPSV4 or the meningococcal conjugate vaccine containing 4 μg of capsular polysaccharide each from serogroups A, C, Y, W-135 (MCV4). Both vaccines were highly immunogenic to all four serogroups, although the MCV4 recipients reported more local reactions than the MPSV4 group (69% vs 30%) (CitationKeyserling et al 2005). Follow-up at 3 years demonstrated persistence of SBA and booster responses to MCV4 consistent with immune memory that was not present in the MPSV4 group (CitationKeyserling et al 2005). In January 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed Meningococcal Polysaccharide (serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135) Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine (MCV4, Menactra®, SanofiPasteur, Inc., Swiftwater, PA, US) for the immunization of adolescents and adults aged 11–55 years age (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005).

A US study compared safety and immunogenicity of MCV4 with MPSV4 in 2- to 10-year-old children. The percentage of children with SBA titers ≥1/128 ranged from 81%–97% across the 4 serogroups in the MCV4 group versus 73%–93% for the MPSV4 group (CitationPichichero et al 2005). Mild to moderate local and systemic reactions of short duration were common and comparable in both groups (CitationPichichero et al 2005). A subgroup of children vaccinated with MCV4 were given a challenge dose of MPSV4 23–36 months later. They demonstrated an increase in IgG antibody and antibody avidity consistent with the induction of immune memory (CitationPichichero et al 2006). A UK study gave MCV4 to children 2 to <5 years old who had previously received the monovalent meningococcal C conjugate vaccine. All 44 children developed SBA titers ≥8 to all four serogroups with a booster response observed to serogroup C (CitationEl Bashir et al 2006). In October, 2007 the FDA subsequently licensed MCV4 for use in children aged 2–10 years (CitationMMWR 2007).

Another study compared vaccine doses of 1, 4, and 10 μg for each of the four polysaccharide serogroups conjugated to diphtheria toxoid that were given to infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Presumed protective SBA levels >/= 1:8 varied from 54% to 92% 1 month after the primary series depending upon vaccine serogroup and polysaccharide dose. A polysaccharide content of 10 μg was associated with more frequent local reactions but not with a corresponding increase in immunogenicity than lower doses of each serogroup (CitationRennels et al 2004). Consequently, there is no advantage to having a higher dose of the polysaccharide serogroups in the diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) among MCV4 recipients

In October 2005, reports suggested a possible association of GBS with MCV4, and the ACIP recommended that persons with a past history of GBS not be vaccinated with MCV4 unless they are at high risk for meningococcal disease (CitationMMWR 2006). As of October 2007, there were 24 confirmed reports of GBS after administration of MCV4 to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (CitationClark 2007). However, no cases of GBS were reported among 11- to 19-year-olds within 6 weeks after more then 200,000 doses of MCV4 from the Vaccine Safety Datalink project (CitationClark 2007). The excess risk of GBS is currently estimated to be from 0.4 to 1.3 per million doses (CitationClark 2007). The benefits of MCV4 are currently considered to significantly outweigh the potential risks, except in patients with a prior history of GBS (see contraindications and precautions).

Indications for use of MCV4

lists the recommendations for the use of MCV4 made by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. It is routinely recommended for all US children aged 11–18 years, including those at additional risk. The vaccine is now recommended for use in at-risk children ages 2–10 years (CitationMMWR 2007) and at-risk adults aged 19–55 years. Persons aged 2–55 years who continue to be at risk for meningococcal infection, despite having been vaccinated with MPSV4 3 or more years earlier, are also candidates for revaccination with MCV4 (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). The FDA has not approved the vaccine for use in children younger then 2 years or adults older then 55 years. Consequently MPSV4 could be substituted for adults older than 55 years.

Table 2 Recommendations for use of tetravalent (A, C, Y, W-135) meningococcal conjugate vaccine

Contraindications and precautions to use of MCV4

Administration of MCV4 is contraindicated among persons known to have a severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine, including diphtheria toxoid or to natural latex rubber. MCV4 is an inactivated vaccine and may be given to immunosuppressed persons, but this may result in suboptimal immune response. No data are available about its safety during pregnancy (CitationBilukha and Rosenstein 2005). A history of GBS is considered a precaution to administering MCV4, and MPSV4 is an acceptable short-term alternative providing protection for approximately 3–5 years (CitationMMWR 2007).

Cost effectiveness of MCV4

Cost effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination has been somewhat controversial, especially with the polysaccharide MPSV4 vaccine in developed countries where the vast majority of meningococcal cases are sporadic. One analysis estimated that vaccinating all US college freshmen living in dormitories with MPSV4 would cost US$0.6–$1.9 million per case averted and US$7–20 million per death averted (CitationScott 2002). This analysis did not consider the cost of chemoprophylaxis or vaccination in the event of an outbreak, the cost of rehabilitating IMD survivors with sequelae, and the anxiety and stress due to an outbreak in the university community (CitationScott 2002). It has been estimated that routine vaccination of US adolescents 11 years old with MCV4 would prevent 270 cases of meningococcal disease and 36 deaths over 22 years at a cost of US$633,000 per case and US$121,000 per life-year saved (CitationShepard et al 2005). Although financial costs of prevention are high, the mortality and morbidity of IMD warrant the routine use of MCV4 in adolescents.

Conclusion and future issues

In addition to the devastation of the disease, considerable anxiety often accompanies an outbreak of IMD in the community or affected regions. The MCV4 has demonstrated immunogenicity to serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 with an acceptable degree of reactogenicity. Based on the experience with conjugated meningococcal C vaccine in the UK, it is believed that MCV4 will have a similar impact on IMD caused by those serogroups. Because it is a conjugate vaccine, it is believed that the immunity provided by this vaccine will last longer then that provided by MPSV4. However, data suggest that serologic correlates of immunity to serogroup C may wane rapidly after 1 year in young children (CitationSnape et al 2005; CitationBorrow and Miller 2006). The conjugate vaccines prime for immune memory but it is not clear that this occurs quickly or sufficiently enough to provide protection from disease (CitationBorrow and Miller 2006). Protection from disease may therefore depend on persistence of protective antibody levels and herd immunity. Thus far, antibody persistence in older children and adolescents appears good but it remains to be seen whether a booster dose of vaccine will be required at some future date.

Disclosures

Dr. Kimmel owns shares in GSK, and is a member of GSK Family/General Practitioner Advisory Board for Cervical Cancer effective February 2008. He is a consultant for Merck, Inc., and on the speaker’s bureau, and a consultant for SanofiPasteur, and on the speaker’s bureau. He is also a consultant, CDC grant to Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Foundation for project “Increasing Immunizations by Family Physicians”. Richard Zimmerman, MD, MPH, University of Pittsburgh, is the primary investigator. Grant is now expired.

References

  • AbramsonJSSpikaJS1985Persistence of Neisseria meningitidis in the upper respiratory tract after intravenous antibiotic therapy for systemic meningococcal diseaseJ Infect Dis15137013918127
  • BarquetNDomingoP1999Meningococcal disease in a large urban population (Barcelona, 1987–1992): predictors of dismal prognosis. Barcelona Meningococcal Disease Surveillance GroupArch Intern Med15923294010547173
  • BilukhaOORosensteinN2005Prevention and control of meningococcal disease. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)MMWR Recomm Rep54RR-712115917737
  • BorrowRAndrewsN2001Serological basis for use of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines in the United Kingdom: reevaluation of correlates of protectionInfect Immun6915687311179328
  • BorrowRBalmerP2005Meningococcal surrogates of protection – serum bactericidal antibody activityVaccine232222715755600
  • BorrowRMillerE2006Long-term protection in children with meningococcal C conjugate vaccination: lessons learnedExpert Rev Vaccines5851717184222
  • BruceMGRosensteinNE2001Risk factors for meningococcal disease in college studentsJAMA2866889311495618
  • CampbellJDEdelmanR2002Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine given to healthy adultsJ Infect Dis18618485112447774
  • [CDC] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention2007Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Report, Emerging Infections Program Network, Neisseria meningitidis, 2006 [online]. Accessed 26 Mar 2008. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/abcs/survreports/mening06.pdf
  • ClarkT2007Meningococcal conjugate vaccine and Guillain Barre syndromeAdvisory Committee on Immunization Practices meetingOct 24 2007Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • CondonRJRileyTV1994Invasive meningococcal infection after splenectomyBMJ30879238142850
  • DanzigL2004Meningococcal vaccinesPediatr Infect Dis J2312 SupplS2859215597071
  • El BashirHHeathPT2006Antibody responses to meningococcal (groups A, C, Y and W135) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine in children who previously received meningococcal C conjugate vaccineVaccine242544916417952
  • EU-IBIS2006Invasive Neisseria meningitidis in Europe – 2006 [online]. Accessed Apr 5 2008. URL: www.euibis.org
  • GardnerP2006Clinical practice. Prevention of meningococcal diseaseN Engl J Med35514667317021322
  • GirgisNFrenckRWJr1998Azithromycin compared with rifampin for eradication of nasopharyngeal colonization by Neisseria meningitidis.Pediatr Infect Dis J1781699779768
  • GoldschneiderIGotschlichEC1969aHuman immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodiesJ Exp Med1291307264977280
  • GoldschneiderIGotschlichEC1969bHuman immunity to the meningococcus. II. Development of natural immunityJ Exp Med1291327484977281
  • GotschlichECGoldschneiderI1969Human immunity to the meningococcus. IV. Immunogenicity of group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharides in human volunteersJ Exp Med1291367844977283
  • GranoffDM2004Meningococcal vaccinesPlotkinSAOrensteinWOffitPAVaccines4th edPhiladelphia, PAElsevier-Saunders95987
  • GranoffDMGuptaRK1998Induction of immunologic refractoriness in adults by meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccinationJ Infect Dis17887049728562
  • GranoffDMPollardAJ2007Reconsideration of the use of meningococcal polysaccharide vaccinePediatr Infect Dis J267162217848884
  • HahneSGraySJ2002W135 meningococcal disease in England and Wales associated with Hajj 2000 and 2001Lancet3595828311867116
  • HarrisonLHDwyerDM1999Risk of meningococcal infection in college studentsJAMA28119061010349894
  • HarrisonLHPassMA2001Invasive meningococcal disease in adolescents and young adultsJAMA286694911495619
  • JodarLFeaversIM2002Development of vaccines against meningococcal diseaseLancet359149950811988262
  • KeyserlingHPapaT2005Safety, immunogenicity, and immune memory of a novel meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (MCV-4) in healthy adolescentsArch Pediatr Adolesc Med1599071316203934
  • MacDonaldNEHalperinSA1998Induction of immunologic memory by conjugated vs plain meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccine in toddlers: a randomized controlled trialJAMA280168599832000
  • MaidenMCStuartJM2002Carriage of serogroup C meningococci 1 year after meningococcal C conjugate polysaccharide vaccinationLancet35918293112044380
  • MMWR2000Prevention and control of meningococcal disease. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep49RR0711010993565
  • MMWR2001aExposure to patients with meningococcal disease on aircrafts – United States, 1999–2001MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep504859
  • MMWR2001bPublic health dispatch: update: assessment of risk for meningococcal disease associated with the Hajj 2001MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep502212
  • MMWR2006Update: Guillain-Barre syndrome among recipients of Menactra meningococcal conjugate vaccine – United States, June 2005–September 2006MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep551120417060898
  • MMWR2007Notice to readers: recommendation from the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) for use of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) in children aged 2–10 years at increased risk for invasive meningococcal diseaseMMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep5612656
  • MMWR2008Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria meningitidis – Minnesota and North Dakota, 2007–2008MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep57173518288075
  • NealKRNguyen-Van-TamJS2000Changing carriage rate of Neisseria meningitidis among university students during the first week of term: cross sectional studyBMJ320846910731181
  • O’HallahanJLennonD2004The strategy to control New Zealand’s epidemic of group B meningococcal diseasePediatr Infect Dis J2312 SupplS293815597072
  • PichicheroMCaseyJ2005Comparative trial of the safety and immunogenicity of quadrivalent (A, C, Y, W-135) meningococcal polysaccharide-diphtheria conjugate vaccine versus quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine in two- to ten-year-old childrenPediatr Infect Dis J24576215665711
  • PichicheroMPapaT2006Immune memory in children previously vaccinated with an experimental quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccinePediatr Infect Dis J25995100017072120
  • PollardAJ2004Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease and vaccine efficacyPediatr Infect Dis J2312 SupplS274915597069
  • PollardAJFraschC2001Development of natural immunity to Neisseria meningitidisVaccine1913274611163654
  • RamsayMEAndrewsN2001Efficacy of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in teenagers and toddlers in EnglandLancet357195611213098
  • RamsayMEAndrewsNJ2003Herd immunity from meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination in England: database analysisBMJ326365612586669
  • RennelsMKingJJr2004Dosage escalation, safety and immunogenicity study of four dosages of a tetravalent meninogococcal polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine in infantsPediatr Infect Dis J234293515131466
  • RosensteinNLevineO1998Efficacy of meningococcal vaccine and barriers to vaccinationJAMA27943599466635
  • RosensteinNEPerkinsBA2001Meningococcal diseaseN Engl J Med34413788811333996
  • ScottRDMeltzerMJ2002Vaccinating first-year college students living in dormitories for meningococcal diseaseAm J Prev Med239810512121797
  • ShepardCWOrtega-SanchezIR2005Cost-effectiveness of conjugate meningococcal vaccination strategies in the United StatesPediatrics11512203215867028
  • SnapeMDKellyDF2005Lack of serum bactericidal activity in preschool children two years after a single dose of serogroup C meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccinePediatr Infect Dis J241283115702040
  • TrotterCLAndrewsNJ2004Effectiveness of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine 4 years after introductionLancet364365715276396
  • van DeurenMBrandtzaegP2000Update on meningococcal disease with emphasis on pathogenesis and clinical managementClin Microbiol Rev131446610627495
  • YazdankhahSPKrizP2004Distribution of serogroups and genotypes among disease-associated and carried isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from the Czech Republic, Greece, and NorwayJ Clin Microbiol4251465315528708