84
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Knowledge and attitude of physicians in a major teaching hospital towards atherosclerotic risk reduction therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Pages 1019-1027 | Published online: 28 Dec 2022

Abstract

Background

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a marker of advanced atherosclerosis with an elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Although intensive risk reduction therapy is critical in reducing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with PAD, the awareness of this information among all physicians is felt to be low. Given the role of family physicians (FP), general internists (GI), cardiologists (C), and vascular surgeons (VS) in treating patients with PAD, we sought to determine their perceptions and knowledge of risk reduction therapy in these patients.

Methods and results

We conducted a cross-sectional self-administered survey of 84 physicians who work at a major teaching hospital. FP, GI, C, and VS represent 39%, 33%, 16%, and 12% of the surveyed physicians, respectively. The recommended targets of LDL-cholesterol, blood glucose and blood pressure in PAD patients were known to 37.3%, 94.1% and 35.3% of physicians, respectively. The majority of physicians reported to screen for risk factors in PAD. Although 86.3% of physicians would recommend antiplatelets therapy in PAD, only 17.6% would recommend angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; 25.5% would recommend nicotine replacement therapy for smokers and 62.7% would recommend statins. Compared to other specialties, cardiologists had the lowest threshold, whereas GI had the highest threshold for initiating antiplatelets and statins for patients with PAD.

Conclusion

The perceptions towards risk reduction in PAD identify glaring knowledge and action gaps. Effective strategies to encourage health professionals to use risk reduction therapy are needed.

Introduction

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease that affects lower extremities. The risk factors for PAD are the same as those for atherosclerosis in general and include male sex, advanced age, cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia (CitationFowkes et al 1992).

PAD is a marker of advanced atherosclerosis with an elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Patients with PAD have a 4 fold increased risk of myocardial infarction (CitationCriqui et al 1992) and a 2–3-fold increased risk of stroke (CitationWilterdink and Easton 1992) compared to persons without PAD. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with PAD is comparable to that in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (CitationCAPRIE Steering Committee 1996).

Reducing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes of atherosclerosis through risk factor identification and modification has been an active area of research over the past few decades. Since PAD is a marker of advanced atherosclerosis with an elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, intensive risk reduction therapy is critical in these patients. Risk reduction therapy such as smoking cessation, blood sugar control, blood pressure control, antiplatelets, statin, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are proven therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in PAD patients (CitationStratton et al 2000; CitationYusuf et al 2000; CitationAntithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration 2002; CitationHeart Protection Collaborative Group 2002; CitationLu and Creager 2004; CitationWilligendael et al 2004). These results have led several expert committees in recommending their use patients with PAD (CitationAbramson et al 2005; CitationHirsch et al 2006; CitationSmith et al 2006).

Although the adverse outcomes in patients with PAD are well documented, the awareness of this information among all physicians is felt to be low (CitationHirsch et al 2004). The knowledge and implementation of atherosclerotic risk factors reduction in PAD patients have been shown to be suboptimal among general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, cardiologists, and vascular surgeons in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom (CitationHirsch et al 2001; CitationMcDermott et al 2002; CitationCassar, Belch et al 2003; CitationCassar, Coull et al 2003; CitationAl Omran et al 2006).

The knowledge and implementation of risk factors reduction in patients with PAD among physicians in Saudi Arabia are not known and given the central role of physicians practicing in academic institutes in disseminating the standard of care in treating various diseases, this study was performed to assess the knowledge of the recommended target levels for blood pressure, blood glucose and LDL-cholesterol and knowledge and attitude towards risk reduction therapy in patients with PAD among physicians practicing in a major teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all family physicians, general internists, cardiologists and vascular surgeons working at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in March 2006. KKUH is the major teaching hospital for the college of medicine, King Saud University; which is the oldest and largest medical school in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was based on a previously published questionnaire with some modifications (CitationAl Omran et al 2006). The questionnaire was anonymous and physicians were consented before participation. This study was approved by KKUH Ethics Review Board.

The survey contained multiple-choice questions (Appendix). The questions requested information from participants regarding their demographics (age, gender, specialty, board certification status, years of experience), their knowledge about target levels of blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, and blood glucose in patients with PAD, in addition to their attitudes toward patient counseling about cardiovascular risk reduction; comfort with recommending and instituting risk reduction therapy (smoking cessation, antiplatelets; statin; ACE inhibitors; and antihypertensive medications), factors that influence adequate risk reduction therapy delivery in PAD patients, proportion of patients with PAD who have their vascular risk factors evaluated systematically by the participants, and their self-assessment of PAD risk reduction knowledge.

All survey results are expressed as percentages. The number of respondents who completed each question provided the denominator for proportions of responses. The prespecified subgroups for analysis were specialty type (family physicians versus general internists versus cardiologists versus vascular surgeons). Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions between different subgroups. All p-values reported were two tailed, and were considered significant at the 0.05 level.

Results

Fifty one of the 84 surveyed physicians at KKUH completed the survey, representing a response rate of 60.7%. Family physicians, general internists, cardiologists and vascular surgeons represent 39%, 33%, 16%, and 12% of the surveyed physicians, respectively. The results are depicted in -.

Table 1 Characteristics of physicians who completed the survey by specialty (N = 51)

Table 4 Barriers for delivering risk reduction therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease as viewed by physicians participated in the survey expressed in percentage

Physicians’ characteristics

Two third of participated physicians are board certified in their specialties. Almost half of the respondents were practicing for more than 10 years ().

Physicians’ knowledge and attitude

The knowledge of the surveyed participants for the recommended targets of LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure was low, on the other hand their knowledge for the recommended target level of blood glucose was high (). Only 21.6% knew that ACE inhibitor can be initiated in PAD patients irrespective of the blood pressure status, as an anti-atherosclerotic therapy (). Eighty five percent of the surveyed physicians indicated that their self assessment of risk reduction in PAD was average to below average.

Table 2 Knowledge of physicians participated in the survey of risk reduction in patients with peripheral arterial disease expressed in percentage

Attitude towards routine patients counseling with regard to the importance of risk factor control was suboptimal (). Apart from routine initiation of antiplatelets therapy (86.3%), the attitude towards routine initiation and/or modification of other risk reduction therapy was very poor especially for initiating ACE inhibitors (17.7%). The highest threshold for initiating different risk reduction therapies was observed among general internist compared to other specialists, however, it was only statistically significant for initiating statin therapy (p = 0.025). On the other hand, cardiologists appeared to have the lowest threshold in initiating these therapies; however, it was not statistically significant for any therapy (). Two third of participants evaluate less than half of their PAD patients for vascular risk factors ().

Table 3 Attitude of physicians participated in the survey towards risk reduction in patients with peripheral arterial disease expressed in percentage

Barriers for delivering risk reduction therapy

The barriers for not receiving adequate risk reduction therapy with the participants’ responses are shown in .

Discussion

Patients with PAD generally have widespread arterial disease and therefore are at a significantly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death (CitationThe TASC Working Group 2001). Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of death in patients with PAD and accounts for 40%–60% of deaths. Stroke accounts for 10%–20% of deaths. Only 20% to 30% of patients with PAD die of non-cardiovascular causes (CitationThe TASC Working Group 2001). Patients with PAD have a 6 fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality compared to patients without PAD (CitationCriqui et al 1992). Therefore, intensive risk reduction therapy is critical in these patients to reduce the adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Risk reduction pharmacotherapy (antiplatelets, statins, and ACE inhibitors) are proven therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in PAD patients in large scale randomized clinical trials (CitationYusuf et al 2000; CitationAntithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration 2002; CitationHeart Protection Collaborative Group 2002). On the other hand, although there are no randomized clinical trials to prove the role of smoking cessation and blood sugar control in reducing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis; large observational studies showed their effect to do so (CitationLu and Creager 2004; Stratton et al 2004).

The compelling evidence from the literature has led several expert panels to recommend atherosclerotic risk reduction therapy use in all patients with PAD (CitationExpert Panel on Detection 2001; CitationSmith et al 2001, Citation2006; CitationAmerican Diabetes Association 2003; CitationChobanian et al 2003). Furthermore, with the increasing recognition of the disease burden in patients with PAD, separate guidelines have been published to encourage the use of risk reduction therapies (CitationAbramson et al 2005; CitationHirsch et al 2006).

Although there is strong evidence supporting the importance of using risk reduction therapy in patients with PAD, in this study we have shown that despite the majority of surveyed physicians evaluate and counsel patients with PAD for their risk factors, knowledge and action remain suboptimal, and clear gaps have been identified. Majority of surveyed physicians rated their knowledge about risk reduction as average or above average; however, there is deficiency in the knowledge of the recommended target levels of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol levels. In addition, minority of the participants knew that ACE inhibitor can be used in PAD patients irrespective to the blood pressure status for reducing atherosclerotic complications and cardiovascular death. Furthermore, there was also deficiency in initiating risk reduction therapy especially for ACE inhibitors and anti-smoking therapies. The action gap was most prominent among general internists compared to other specialties.

Our findings could be explained by the absence of national or locally adapted guidelines in managing patients with PAD and the reluctance of physicians to apply CAD guidelines to the PAD patient population even though the risks are similar, if not higher (CitationCriqui et al 1992). Furthermore, the suboptimal use of ACE inhibitors could be explained by the fact that the evidence supporting the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with PAD to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events is not a level A evidence and also dependent on the presence of symptoms (class IIa recommendation for symptomatic patients with PAD and Class IIb recommendation for asymptomatic patients) (CitationHirsch et al 2006).

Knowledge and action gaps in managing risk factors in patients with PAD also have been shown among physicians in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada (CitationMcDermott et al 2002; CitationMukherjee et al 2002; CitationCassar et al 2003; CitationAl Omran et al 2006). CitationCassar et al (2003) showed that over a quarter of the UK vascular surgeons would not screen for diabetes or measure blood pressure in patients with PAD and only 34% of them would treat claudicants if the cholesterol was greater than 5.5 mmol/l. McDeermott et al (2002) showed that only 45.5% of the internal medicine physicians (IMP) prescribe antiplatelets to patients with PAD compared to 52.5% of the vascular surgeons, and only 16.8% of the vascular surgeons knew the large effect of cholesterol lowering on the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with PAD compared to 43.6% of the IMP. Furthermore, even in cardiologists who were surveyed there was knowledge and action gaps in dealing with atherosclerotic risk. CitationAl-Omran et al (2006) showed that the utilization of risk reduction pharmacotherapy and the knowledge of the recommended target levels of blood glucose, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with PAD among Canadian vascular surgeons were suboptimal. Furthermore, Mukherjee et al showed a suboptimal use of lifestyle modifications such as smoking cessation, exercise, weight reduction and diet for lipid control, and the use of evidence-based therapy such as antiplatelets therapy, ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, and statins in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions for PAD at hospital discharge and at 6 months follow-up (CitationMukherjee et al 2002).

The knowledge and action gaps in managing risk factors in patients with PAD from the previously published studies (CitationMcDermott et al 2002; CitationCassar et al 2003; CitationAl Omran et al 2006) along with our data add support to the available literature documenting inequities in use of risk reduction therapies for patients with PAD in comparison to patients with CAD (CitationHirsch et al 2004). Furthermore, this data can be useful in supporting a call to action for PAD management and public awareness (CitationHirsch et al 2004).

In the evaluation of these results, certain limitations merit emphasis. The small number of the participants included in this survey. It is also important to stress that this survey reflects the practice of physicians in a single teaching institute, and may not be generalizable to other hospitals. Also, since the data represent self-reported perceptions of knowledge they may underestimate the true gap. In addition, the survey form did not differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic PAD with regard to the use of ACE inhibitors as a risk reduction therapy.

In conclusion, the perceptions towards risk reduction in PAD identify glaring knowledge and action gaps, despite a considerable effort to evaluate and counsel patients for their risk factors. Given the heightened risk of cardiovascular adverse outcomes in patients with PAD, these data have important and immediate implications. If the current practice continues, the observed knowledge and action gaps are expected to persist. These findings may be useful for guiding targeted interventions such as locally adapted clinical practice guidelines in managing patients with PAD, self audit of practice, focused continuing medical education programs, the inclusion of risk reduction pharmacotherapy as a plenary topic at scientific meetings, and other educational outreach programs that aim to bring physicians’ practice into agreement with current guidelines for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Note

Presented in part at the 7th International Congress of the Asian Society for Vascular Surgery, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 2006.

References

  • AbramsonBLHuckellVAnandSCanadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference: peripheral arterial disease – executive summaryCan J Cardiol200521997100616234879
  • Al OmranMLindsayTFMajorJPerceptions of Canadian vascular surgeons toward pharmacological risk reduction in patients with peripheral arterial diseaseAnn Vasc Surg2006205556316871436
  • American Diabetes AssociationPosition statement. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitusDiabetes Care200326S335012502618
  • Antithrombotic Trialists’ CollaborationCollaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patientsBMJ20023247329718611786451
  • CAPRIE Steering CommitteeA randomized, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering CommitteeLancet19963481329398918275
  • CassarKBelchJJBrittendenJAre national cardiac guidelines being applied by vascular surgeons?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg200326623814603422
  • CassarKCoullRBachooPManagement of secondary risk factors in patients with intermittent claudicationEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg200326262614509888
  • ChobanianAVBakrisGLBlackHRThe seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 reportJAMA200328925607212748199
  • CriquiMHLangerRDFronekAMortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial diseaseN Engl J Med199232638161729621
  • Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in AdultsExecutive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA200128524869711368702
  • FowkesFGHousleyERiemersmaRASmoking, lipids, glucose intolerance, and blood pressure as risk factors for peripheral atherosclerosis compared with ischemic heart disease in the Edinburgh Artery StudyAm J Epidemiol1992135331401550087
  • Heart Protection Collaborative GroupMRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20, 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trialLancet2002360932672212114036
  • HirschATCriquiMHTreat-JacobsonDPeripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary careJAMA200128613172411560536
  • HirschATGloviczkiPDroozAMandate for creation of a national peripheral arterial disease public awareness program: an opportunity to improve cardiovascular healthJ Vasc Surg2004394748114743158
  • HirschATHaskalZJHertzerNRACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease FoundationCirculation2006113e46365416549646
  • LuJTCreagerMAThe relationship of cigarette smoking to peripheral arterial diseaseRev Cardiovasc Med200451899315580157
  • McDermottMMHahnEAGreenlandPAtherosclerotic risk factor reduction in peripheral arterial disease: results of a national physician surveyJ Gen Intern Med20021789590412472925
  • MukherjeeDLingamPChetcutiSMissed opportunities to treat atherosclerosis in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions: insights from the University of Michigan Peripheral Vascular Disease Quality Improvement Initiative (PVD-QI2)Circulation200210619091212370211
  • SmithSCJrAllenJBlairSNAHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCirculation200611323637216702489
  • SmithSCJrBlairSNBonowROAHA/ACC Guidelines for Preventing Heart Attack and Death in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: 2001 update. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of CardiologyJ Am Coll Cardiol2001381581311691544
  • StrattonIMAdlerAINeilHAAssociation of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational studyBMJ20003214051210938048
  • The TASC Working GroupManagment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD); Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)J Vasc Surg200131(1 Part 2) SupplS1288
  • WilligendaelEMTeijinkJABartelinkMLInfluence of smoking on incidence and prevalence of peripheral arterial diseaseJ Vasc Surg20044011586515622370
  • WilterdinkJLEastonJDVascular event rates in patients with atherosclerotic cerebrovascular diseaseArch Neurol199249857631524519
  • YusufSSleightPPogueJEffects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study InvestigatorsN Engl J Med20003421455310639539

Appendix

The survey questionnaire