![Sample our Language & Literature journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5941/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Language-Literature.jpg"})
Abstract
The Mekong has long attracted interest although it remains economically insignificant. A group of riparian states known as the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) – Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam and Yunnan Province (China) – now manage aspects of regional development including trade, water management and education. Standard GMS discourse holds that English should be the lingua franca of the region and promotes the language widely through education. In GMS countries, that language is not English. Using economic and demographic data, I argue that many GMS citizens are for now unlikely to experience life through English and that the region is already equipped with languages of cross-border communication because neighbours often share dialects and because Chinese dialects have long linked ethnic Chinese interests across borders. In response, instruction in English as an additional language should be offered less with communicative fluency in mind than as a basis for future learning as required by unforeseeable events. Moreover, the link between English and modernity need not be feared because the EFL nature of English in the region complements other, overlapping identities in ways best left to individuals and groups to deal with based on factors policymakers cannot anticipate.
Notes
1. While five of the six riparian states (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam) are independent nations, Yunnan Province is part of the People's Republic of China. However, for convenience, I refer to all six entities as ‘countries’ throughout this paper.
2. Data from the CIA Factbook (2006) cover five of the six GMS economies (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam) but exclude Yunnan Province, which is part of the People's Republic of China and thus not analysed separately in this data source.