5
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Comments on the commentary by Kraft & Saunders [Phycologia 39: 258–261 (2000)]

Pages 99-100 | Accepted 07 Sep 2001, Published online: 14 Jan 2020
 

Abstract

Arguments presented by Kraft & Saunders [Phycologia 39: 258–261 (2000)] against the use of the name Cryptonemiales Schmitz (1892) and in favour of the name Halymeniales Saunders & Kraft (1996) are rejected on the basis that their preferred usage represents a return to the ‘circumscription method’ of nomenclature, which was considered unworkable and thus replaced with the type method by the Fifth International Botanical Congress (Cambridge, UK, 1930).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.