588
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Priority Paper Evaluation

Systolic Heart Failure: Should we Care About Electrical, Mechanical or Electromechanical Dyssynchrony?

Pages 151-153 | Published online: 15 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Evaluation of: Cho GY, Kim HK, Kim YJ et al.: Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony for prediction of cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure. Heart (2009) (Epub ahead of print). Prolonged QRS duration is electrocardiographic evidence of electrical dyssynchrony and is associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events and mortality. The study by Cho et al. (167 patients were followed up for 33.4 ± 19.9 months) shows that mechanical dyssynchrony has an additional value over QRS duration in predicting cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure. The dyssynchrony was assessed through tissue Doppler imaging – a temporal difference between the septal to lateral wall (Ts-1) of 65 ms or more defined the mechanical dyssynchrony. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, both QRS duration (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.85; p = 0.032) and Ts-1 (HR: 2.35; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of cardiac events. Those with both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony had a HR of 3.98 (95% CI: 2.02–7.86; p < 0.001) when compared with those with a normal QRS duration and absence of mechanical dyssynchrony. Combining the information provided by QRS duration with mechanical dyssynchrony through Ts-1 is clinically relevant to stratifying the risk of hospitalization or death in systolic heart failure patients. However, these data do not support the use of mechanical dyssynchrony to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy, nor to predict response to this therapy. This was not assessed by the study.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 246.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.