Abstract
Aims: To assess the prevalence of anemia and iron deficiency anemia in heart failure (HF) patients, to evaluate the effectiveness of current iron deficiency treatment strategies after discharge, and to analyze hospital readmissions and mortality rates in patients with and without anemia. Patients & methods: A patient registry-based, multicenter, retrospective, observational, cohort study of 418 hospitalized HF patients in Italy, monitored from 1 March 2010 to 30 March 2011. Results: Among patients with HF, 35.9% had anemia at admission; only 51.3% were treated with current iron deficiency treatment strategies during hospitalization and then only 29% of patients who were anemic at discharge were treated with iron at home. After a 4-week follow-up, only 11% of these patients reached the hemoglobin target value (study primary end point). However, current iron deficiency treatment strategies were not significantly associated with reduced risk of rehospitalization, but with a significantly reduced mortality rate after a 6-month follow-up (study secondary end points: 11.7 vs 51.7%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In HF patients, there is poor attention paid to anemia, its causes and treatment. Current iron deficiency treatment strategies are mismanaged and CARMES-1 demonstrated that they appear to be insufficient at improving patient outcome in terms of rehospitalization rate reduction, generating high costs, which could be avoided through an optimized treatment strategy. Therefore, more efficacious, efficient and cost–effective treatment strategies are required in Italy for HF patients with iron deficiency anemia to meet this unmet medical need.
Ethical conduct of research
The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Assistance for the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Content Ed Net srl and this activity was funded by Vifor.