https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-4948
![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Aim: To assess whether Ki67 is related to the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients at high risk of postsurgical recurrence. Methods: A total of 716 patients undergoing surgical resection with or without PA-TACE were retrospectively enrolled. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze Ki67 expression. Results: There was no significant difference in tumor-free survival between patients who underwent resection with or without chemoembolization. However, chemoembolization was associated with significantly higher tumor-free survival rates among patients with ‘low’ (<30%) or ‘moderate’ (30–59%) levels of Ki67. Patients highly expressing Ki67 displayed higher rates of overall recurrence, earlier recurrence, multiple intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis. Conclusion: In patients with relatively high Ki67 levels, PA-TACE does not appear to improve outcomes.
Plain language summary
Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE), as an adjuvant treatment to surgery, is widely recommended in patients with high-risk factors for recurrence. Nevertheless, some studies challenge whether it actually improves prognosis, thus the influence of PA-TACE on prognosis remains controversial. The present research indicated that the ability of PA-TACE to help inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence is conditionally restrictive, and it appears to be beneficial only in those patients with a low or moderate Ki67 index (<60%). For patients with high Ki67 expression, compared with PA-TACE, ‘adjuvant immunotherapy’ may be a potential alternative option. This finding suggests a valuable reference to identify the best beneficiaries of PA-TACE for individualized treatment.
Supplementary data
To view the supplementary data that accompany this paper please visit the journal website at: www.futuremedicine.com/doi/suppl/10.2217/fon-2021-1443
Author contributions
J Xu and L Qi designed the study; J Xu, WT Xing and YC Peng analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; L Qi helped critically revise the manuscript for important intellectual content and YY Chen helped collect data.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant/Award Number: 81972306). Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (Grant/Award Number: YCSW2021140); Guangxi Natural Sciences Grants (Grant/Award Number: 2018GXNSFAA138028). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Ethical conduct of research
The protocol for this study was approved by the ethics committee of the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital (LW2020078). The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.