Lack of Association Between ABCC2 Gene Variants and Treatment Response in Epilepsy

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to replicate a previously reported association between drug resistance in epilepsy patients and the 24C>T variant of the ABCC2 gene that codes for the drug efflux transporter MRP2. Patients & methods: We genotyped 381 Caucasian epileptic patients (337 drug resistant and 44 drug responsive) and 247 healthy controls for the ABCC2 gene -24C>T polymorphism (rs717620) and two other nearby SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (1249G>A and 3972C>T). Genotype, allele and three-SNP-haplotype frequencies were compared between groups. Patients were further stratified into four groups according to their degree of drug resistance (as measured by seizure frequency under medication) to perform regression analysis against genotypes and haplotpyes. Results: We detected no significant differences in the distribution of any of the tested alleles, genotypes or haplotypes between the investigated groups. Neither was there an association between genotypes or haplotypes and degree of drug resistance. This study was adequately powered to detect genotype relative risks of above two. Conclusion: Although adequately powered to detect the previously reported effect size and although our definition of drug resistance, following the International League Against Epilepsy guidelines, was slightly stricter than in the original study, we failed to confirm an association between the 24C>T variant in the ABCC2 gene and drug resistance in epilepsy.

Original submitted: 31 May 2011; Revision submitted: 15 August 2011

KEYWORDS::

• ABCC2
• drug resistance
• epilepsy
• multidrug resistance-associated proteins
• pharmacogenetics

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.