CYP2W1 Polymorphism: Functional Aspects and Relation to Risk for Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to investigate the possible association between the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and allelic variants of CYP2W1 and their functional properties. Materials & methods: The distribution of three different CYP2W1 alleles (CYP2W1*1, CYP2W1*2 and CYP2W1*6) in 1785 CRC patients and 1761 healthy blood donors was determined using the TaqMan^® (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) allelic discrimination assay or allele-specific amplification. Corresponding gene products (CYP2W1.1, CYP2W1.2 and CYP2W1.6) were expressed in human colon cancer SW480 cells and their activities towards two different substrates, the duocarmycin analogs ICT2706 and ICT2726, were monitored. Results: No significant differences in the distribution of CYP2W1*1, CYP2W1*2 and CYP2W1*6 alleles were found between CRC patients and controls. The CYP2W1.1, CYP2W1.2 and CYP2W1.6 variant enzymes were expressed at the similar levels in the transfected SW480 cells and had comparable kinetics in terms of the metabolism of the duocarmycin ICT2726, as well as in the bioactivation of ICT2706 into a cytotoxic product. Conclusion: These epidemiological data obtained from a large population of CRC patients and controls cannot confirm the previously suggested decreased risk for CRC among carriers of CYP2W1*2. On the molecular level, this conclusion is further supported by the similar catalytic characteristics of the CYP2W1.1, CYP2W1.2 and CYP2W1.6 variants of CYP2W1.

Original submitted 19 March 2013; Revision submitted 15 July 2013

KEYWORDS::

• anticancer therapy
• colon cancer
• cytotoxicity
• drug metabolism
• epidemiology
• indolines

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to M Kacevska for valuable advice, to H Wigzell for continuous interest and to O Bergsten and A Moreborg for skillful work in this project. The authors also thank the Swedish Low Risk Colorectal Cancer Study Group and S von Holst for the recruitment of patients.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported by grants from The Swedish Cancer Foundation, The Swedish Research Council and Yorkshire Cancer Research, UK. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by grants from The Swedish Cancer Foundation, The Swedish Research Council and Yorkshire Cancer Research, UK. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.