59
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Series

Enhancing Post-Operative Analgesia Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Implant: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block Utilizing Liposomal Bupivacaine

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 717-722 | Received 08 Jun 2023, Accepted 22 Nov 2023, Published online: 06 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an inter-fascial plane block that provides multi-dermatomal analgesia for treatment of acute pain and chronic neuropathic pain in the trunk. This retrospective case series describes a novel method of treating acute postoperative pain after spinal cord stimulation implant with erector spinae plane block using liposomal bupivacaine. Bilateral erector spinae plane block was administered at L1–L2 intervertebral level in 18 cases prior to performing spinal cord stimulation implant at one interspace above. This study reveals that the block provides effective analgesia as evidenced by low pain scores and less opioid consumption after surgery.

Financial disclosure

M Murphy is a consultant to Medtronic and Relievant. R Teames is a consultant to Pacira, Mindray, Fujifilm and Avanos. Competing disclosures: M Murphy has competing interest with Medtronic, Relievant and Pacira bioscience. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Competing interests disclosure

A Sagir has no conflict of interest to disclose. M Murphy is a consultant to Medtronic and Relievant. R Teames is a consultant to Pacira, Mindray, Fujifilm and Avanos. D Calenda has no conflict of interest to disclose. The authors have no other competing interests or relevant affiliations with any organization or entity with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Writing disclosure

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The study was determined not to require ethics committee review since it was a retrospective review. The authors state that they have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations.

Additional information

Funding

M Murphy is a consultant to Medtronic and Relievant. R Teames is a consultant to Pacira, Mindray, Fujifilm and Avanos. Competing disclosures: M Murphy has competing interest with Medtronic, Relievant and Pacira bioscience. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 412.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.