36
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PREGNANCY

Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study

, , , , &
Pages 321-327 | Received 12 May 2009, Accepted 23 Nov 2009, Published online: 17 Jan 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the incidence of peripartum hysterectomy in an Italian Region (Emilia-Romagna) and investigate its association with cesarean delivery. Design. Population-based retrospective study using hospital discharge records. Setting. All public and private hospitals in Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. Population. A total of 151,494 women delivering between 2003 and 2006, 131 of whom had a peripartum hysterectomy. Methods. Peripartum hysterectomy was defined as a hysterectomy performed at the time of delivery or afterwards during the same hospitalization. Incidence rates were calculated by type of delivery. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with logistic regression to evaluate the association between peripartum hysterectomy and delivery type. Main outcome measures. Incidence rates of peripartum hysterectomy by type of delivery; odds of peripartum hysterectomy after primary or repeat cesarean compared with vaginal delivery without previous cesarean. Results. A total of 131 peripartum hysterectomies were performed among 151,494 deliveries (0.86/1,000 deliveries; 95% CI 0.72–1.03) with 20.7% primary and 9.6% repeat cesarean deliveries. Women undergoing a primary caesarean delivery were more likely to have a peripartum hysterectomy than women having a vaginal delivery who had never had a cesarean delivery (OR 6.48; 95% CI 4.16–10.07). Women undergoing a repeat caesarean delivery were also at increased risk (OR 3.69; 95% CI 2.11–6.46). Conclusions. In this population, primary and repeat cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk of peripartum hysterectomy. These results are of particular concern given the steady increase in the cesarean delivery rate in many countries. The pathological mechanism of this association requires further investigation.

Acknowledgements

MK is funded by the National Institute for Health Research National Coordinating Centre for Research Capacity Development. All authors are independent of all funders. We greatly appreciated comments provided by Paola Rucci in the preparation of this manuscript.

Declaration of interest: The authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.