3
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Validity of a scored urological history in detecting detrusor instability in female urinary incontinence

, &
Pages 941-945 | Received 18 Jan 1996, Accepted 28 Apr 1996, Published online: 03 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Background. Kauppila and co-workers published in 1982 a detrusor instability score (DIS) for women with urinary incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the DIS in an outpatient clinic for urogynecology.

Methods. The DIS questionnaire was incorporated as part of an independent history at the first consultation. The DIS was compared with clinical diagnosis in 250 patients consecutively referred for evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy of the DIS in diagnosing genuine stress incontinence (GSI) were calculated using the gynecologist's clinical diagnosis based on urodynamic findings as the gold standard. An ROC-curve was constructed for determining the optimum cut-off point for the DIS for women with GSI.

Results. A cut-off point at 7 for the DIS, yielded sensitivity=0.77, specificity=0.52, PPV=0.74, NPV=0.52 and an overall accuracy=0.68. Optimum cut-off point for GSI according to the ROC-curve was at a DIS-value of 5, yielding sensitivity=0.60, specificity=0.77, PPV=0.82, NPV=0.52 and overall accuracy=0.66.

Conclusions. A cut-off point at 7 diagnosed 159 women (64%) as having GSI, 41 of them (16% of 250) having a false positive DIS. Similarly, a cut-off point at 5 diagnosed 112 women (45%) as having GSI, 20 of them (8% of 250) having a false positive DIS. These women, if otherwise feasible and indicated, might perhaps undergo continence surgery without preoperative urodynamics. A lower cut-off point than originally proposed ought therefore to be used if the DIS is to become a useful preoperative tool for this kind of surgery.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.