156
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AUDIOLOGY

Development of a mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (II): Lists equivalence evaluation

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1051-1060 | Received 02 Mar 2011, Accepted 14 Apr 2011, Published online: 23 May 2011
 

Abstract

Conclusions: A set of Chinese Mandarin monosyllable test lists with good reliability and sensitivity was established. Objectives. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the equivalence of a group of monosyllable lists. Methods: A genetic algorithm was adopted to reorganize the material based on the Phoneme Allocation Table; 10 lists with 25 monosyllabic test items in each were generated. A two-factor design was used for the equivalence evaluation test. A total of 80 normal-hearing and native Mandarin-speaking university students (40 males and 40 females) participated in the trial. Every subject was tested with all 10 lists in sequence at 5 presentation levels (–5, 0, 5, 10, and 15 dB HL). Performance-intensity (P-I) function of each list was fit before P-I curve slope and recognition threshold were calculated. Results: Equivalence evaluation results indicated good psychophysical equivalence between the 10 lists except for list 2. List 9 has a reused item. After the elimination of lists 2 and 9, multivariate ANOVA revealed a good equivalence between the remaining eight lists (p = 0.136). The mean threshold of eight equivalent lists was 10.32 ± 0.38 dB HL, while the mean slope was 5.00 ± 0.29%/dB.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863) (#2007AA02Z150), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (#30871398, 30730040, 30830104), National Eleventh Scientific Program (2008BAI50B08, 2007BAI18B12, 2007BAI18B14), and Beijing Nature Science Technology Major Project (7070002). We greatly appreciate assistance by Prof. Tsai Kuen-Shian at the Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Yang-Ming University in Chinese Taiwan.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.