257
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TECHNICAL NOTE

Comparison of COSMED’S FitMate™ and K4b2 metabolic systems reliability during graded cycling exercise

&
Pages 722-724 | Received 29 Jan 2014, Accepted 30 May 2014, Published online: 06 Nov 2014
 

Abstract

This study compared the reliability of the Cosmed FitMate™ and K4b2 metabolic systems during light to heavy steady state exercise. Expired gas, ventilation were recorded in 50 subjects, using in a random order among four sessions, either the FitMate™ or the Cosmed K4b2. No differences in oxygen consumption were observed between the two systems whatever the intensity. Intraclass correlation were high for both analyzers (respectively for the FitMate™ system and the Cosmed K4b2; ICC: 0.76–0.88 vs. 0.88–0.95). The FitMate™ metabolic system could be a useful reliable and easy-to-use metabolic system in energy expenditure measurement.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 200.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.