A single measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover has limited utility in the individual person

Abstract

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are used to estimate the rate of bone loss in the individual osteoporotic patient. During recent years it has become increasingly clear that the biological variability of biochemical bone markers has to be taken into consideration in the evaluation of their usefulness in the clinical setting. Eleven premenopausal, 8 perimenopausal and 11 postmenopausal healthy women were included. We assessed the analytical and the biological components of variation for a number of resorptive and formative bone markers: u-hydroxyproline, u-pyridinoline, and u-deoxypyridinoline together with u-calcium and u-creatinine, s-total alkaline phosphatases and s-osteocalcin. Blood and urine samples were collected five times with 7-day intervals. Urinary parameters were expressed as outputs and corrected for creatinine in fasting night urines and second void fasting morning urines. The absolute values differed with a tendency towards increasing values in the postmenopausal women, but the biological variations in relation to menopausal status were not different. The biological variability was much higher for the urinary resorptive markers than for the formative markers in the blood. The critical difference expressing the difference needed between two serial results from the same person to be significant at a 5% level was 15% for s-alkaline phosphatases. 18% for s-osteocalcin, and lowest in the second void fasting morning urines with values of 28% and 34% for u-pyridinoline/creatinine and u-deoxypyridinoline/creatinine, and 50% and 112% for u-hydroxyproline/creatinine and u-calcium/creatinine, respectively. The index of individuality, denoting the individual variation divided by the variation between subjects, was in the range from 0.19 for s-alkaline phosphatases to 1.23 for u-hydroxyproline/minute in second void fasting morning urine making the use of conventional reference intervals difficult. Low indices, however, indicate high test performance and offer the possibility of stratification of persons within a range. The number of samples required to determine the true individual mean value $5% for the single person, ranged from 5 for s-total alkaline phosphatases, 6 for s-osteocalcin, 23 for u-deoxypyridinoline/creatinine in the fasting morning urine to over two hundred for u-calcium analytes. It is concluded that, due to high biological variation, a single measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover is of limited utility in the individual person. We recommend that routine clinical use of biochemical markers should be restricted until further evidence justifies it.

Key Words:

• biochemical bone markers
• biological variation
• critical difference
• index of individuality
• number of samples
• predictive value