![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) surveillance and management in HIV patients currently followed in an outpatient clinic at a Danish University Hospital.
Methods: Patient data, including demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and hepatitis serology, were reviewed at baseline. Patients with incomplete or non-updated serology within the last 2 y were retested in the next 6 months, and the results were reviewed again at follow-up.
Results: At baseline, 84% and 74% of the 574 HIV patients were found to have incomplete and/or non-updated HBV and HCV serology, respectively. At follow-up, updated HBV serology was achieved in 535 (93%) patients; 15 (3%) patients were found to have a chronic active infection and 156 (27%) had a resolved infection, whereas 65 (11%) were vaccinated against HBV and 299 (52%) were non-immune. No patients were found to have developed chronic HBV infection following HIV diagnosis (equal to 3649 patient-y). Updated HCV serology revealed that 25 (4%) had a chronic active HCV infection and 15 (3%) had a resolved HCV infection. The anti-HCV incidence rate was 0.27/100 patient-y. A liver pathology assessment had not been performed within the last 2 y in 80% of the HBV and 32% of the HCV co-infected patients.
Conclusions: Hepatitis screening and assessment had been inadequately performed. New cases of chronic hepatitis seem to occur infrequently. However, a more proactive hepatitis surveillance and management strategy integrated into the overall HIV health care program is warranted.
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to Mattias Rasmussen, Morten Flink, and Inge Arbs for their assistance in data processing in InfCare HIV.
Declaration of interest: No commercial interests to declare.