Abstract
Hydronephrosis in man or experimental animals can be caused by an increased ureteral flow resistance. This condition can in the long run prove harmful to renal function. We compared two ways of measuring ureteral flow resistance in animals with and without a ureteral hindrance, the hindrance being induced by embedding the ureter in the psoas muscle. One needle connected via catheters to a pressure recording system and another connected to a pump system were introduced through the parenchyma into the renal pelvis. Experiments were carried out with two procedures: 1) infusion of 0.5 mlxmin-1 of saline into the renal pelvis was performed while recording the pressure response; 2) a servocontrolled pump system was used which regulated the flow introduced into the renal pelvis to keep a preset pressure at a constant level. In the first group of experiments we did not establish a steady-state pressure despite 20–30 min of infusion. The result from the second series of experiments indicated that steady-state flow measurements could be achieved at the different pressure levels between zero and 30 mmHg. A good linear relationship between pressure and flow was found, even though a considerable hysteresis was observed. Furthermore, a reduced flow resistance down to a certain level at increased pressure was also recorded. As expected, the resistance to flow was significantly lower in the control than in the hydronephrotic animals. In order to investigate the diagnostic ability of the linear relationship between pressure and flow, prediction regions for one future animal were calculated. It seemed possible that determination of the whole pressure-flow relationship in the pressure range between zero and 30 mmHg will prove useful to determine the flow hindrance in hydronephrotic animals.