230
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
UrologyOriginal Articles

Nerve-sparing procedure in radical prostatectomy: A risk factor for hernia repair following open retropubic, pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures

, , , , &
Pages 164-170 | Received 17 Sep 2010, Accepted 05 Nov 2010, Published online: 08 Feb 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To identify risk factors for hernia repair following open retropubic, pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Material and methods. The medical records of 632 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy (open retropubic n = 430, pure laparoscopic n = 49, and robot-assisted laparoscopic n = 202) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with postprostatectomy inguinal hernia were defined as those who had undergone subsequent hernia repair. The mean period of follow-up was 19.5 months (median 19, range 1 to 42). Results. Hernia repairs were performed in 27 of the 632 patients (4.3%). The site of the repair was right in 15 patients (55.6%), left in 9 patients (33.3%), and bilateral in 3 patients (11.1%). The timing of the hernia repair ranged from 4 to 35 months (mean 13.1) following radical prostatectomy. No difference in hernia-repair-free rates was observed between the extraperitoneal open and transperitoneal pure or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedures (p = 0.225, log-rank test). The log-rank test revealed that the nerve sparing procedure (p = 0.019) and the absence of diabetes (p = 0.017) were significant risk factors for postprostatectomy hernia repair. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, neurovascular bundle saving was the only significant risk factor for postprostatectomy inguinal hernia repair (Hazard ratio, 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 6.41, p = 0.032). Conclusions. These findings suggest that the nerve sparing procedure may increase the risk of hernia repair. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate the possible adverse effects of the nerve sparing technique.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.