Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate the applicability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) as a method of screening for hearing losses among recruits attending obligatory military service. TEOAEs, tympanometry and puretone audiometry were recorded in 95 male recruits. Sixty-one recruits were tested after a 2-month period of gunfire exposure in order to document any permanent change in cochlear function. Screening by pure-tone audiometry showed an unexpectedly high prevalence of hearing losses >20dBHL, probably due to technical reasons. Thresholds were corrected using lower thresholds obtained at the end of service or by ENT specialists. The accuracy with which normal and impaired ears could be identified with TEOAEs analysed in frequency bands was determined by decision theory. Impairment was defined as mean hearing thresholds ≥ 30dBHL averaged from three neighbouring frequencies. Adequate accuracy was obtained in the middle frequencies. Further improvement of the technique is needed before it can be deemed suitable for detecting hearing losses at low and high frequencies. TEOAEs are quicker to measure and offer greater objectivity than pure-tone audiometry. A small decrease in TEOAE level was found after the training period. The TEOAEs were highly repeatable and had a higher sensitivity than pure-tone audiometry to detection of small changes in cochlear function under conditions normally found when testing recruits.