132
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Should we interpret the results of ‘two-step’ glucose screening again according to the obstetric outcomes?

, , &
Pages 705-709 | Published online: 25 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

We aimed to re-evaluate the ‘two-step’ antenatal glucose screening programme in relation to maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus and to compare maternal and foetal outcomes between different groups divided according to glucose tolerance test results. Two-thousand four-hundred and two pregnant women attending for antenatal care were recruited retrospectively for the study. Mean birthweight for pregnancies with single-value abnormality (SVA) in 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was significantly higher than the control group [3420 ± 378 vs. 3294 ± 444]. We found a significantly higher rate of macrosomia in the subgroup of 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) between 130 and 140 mg/dl [9.7% vs. 4.8%]. Pregnant women whose 50-g GCT results are between 130 and 140 mg/dl or who have SVA in 100-g OGTT not only have gestational diabetes, but are also at increased risk for diabetic complications.

Declaration of interest

All the authors have no potential conflicts of interest, existing or known future financial relationships or commercial affiliations to disclose.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.