358
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Risk factors of stillbirths in Victoria (Australia): A case–control study

, &
Pages 754-757 | Received 29 Jan 2015, Accepted 13 Feb 2016, Published online: 09 May 2016
 

Abstract

Stillbirth is one of the most adverse pregnancy outcomes. The rate of stillbirth in high income countries has remained stagnant in recent decades. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of stillbirths specific to hospital-based deliveries in a secondary level hospital in Melbourne, Australia, over a 5-year period. We conducted a case–control study from January 2007 to December 2011. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted in STATA 12.1. The 5-year cumulative incidence of still-birth was 5.3 per 1000 total births (95% CI 4.3, 6.5). Univariate analysis revealed that higher body-mass index, smoking during pregnancy, haemoglobin level (≥14.5 g/dl), previous stillbirth, primiparity, marital status, previous caesarean section and reduced foetal movement in the 2 weeks prior to delivery were associated with increased risk of stillbirth. However, after adjustment for confounders in a multiple-regression model, only previous caesarean section (p = 0.006), unmarried (p = 0.004), high haemoglobin level (p = 0.007) and reduced foetal movement in the 2 weeks prior to delivery (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with increased risk of stillbirth. The characteristics of our study population was similar to the population of state-wide survey in 2009, however, the incidence in our study was slightly lower. We concluded that previous caesarean section, pregnancy while being unmarried, higher haemoglobin level and reduced foetal movement in the 2 weeks before delivery were significant predictors of stillbirth. The identified risk factors were similar to other studies and the obstetric practice at the hospital or the demographics of the study population did not add to additional risk.

View correction statement:
Corrigendum

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.