Osteosarcoma of the spine: Dismal past, any hope for the future?

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyse all cases of spinal osteosarcoma (OS) treated in a regional bone tumour unit over the last 27 years. We were primarily interested in overall survival following tumour surgery, and if there is a difference in the survival of patients undergoing en bloc resection versus non-en bloc surgery. Methods. Prospectively maintained tumour databases were searched in a regional bone tumour unit. All cases of surgically managed spinal OS were extracted and inpatient notes, imaging (including staging), histological margin status, and outcomes (neurological deficit and survival curves) were reviewed. Results. Twenty-six patients were identified between 1985 and 2012. The median age was 26.5 years (range 6–78 y). Overall Kaplan–Meier survival was 69.5% (95% CI: 46.3–84.2%) and 10.8% (95% CI: 1.8–29.0%) at 1 and 5 years, respectively. There appears to be improved survival associated with primary spinal OS compared to that of metastatic disease, but this does not reach statistical significance (p = 0.29, Cox proportional hazards analysis). En bloc resection results in a significantly improved survival time compared to non-en bloc (biopsy and debulking): 44.1% alive at 2 years compared to 9.4%, respectively, p = 0.009. Conclusions. En bloc resection for primary spinal OS is associated with improved survival; there have been major changes in both surgical treatment and chemo/radiotherapy regimens over the period studied, potentially confounding the interpretation.

Keywords::

• chemotherapy
• operative
• spine
• tumour

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.