769
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Predictors for delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement after external ventricular drain removal in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

, , &
Pages 219-224 | Received 29 May 2014, Accepted 14 Sep 2014, Published online: 09 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

Objective. Hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) requires temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage using an external ventricular drain (EVD). This drain is removed if patients pass a clamp trial, or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is placed. Little is known about the risk factors for delayed VPS placement in patients who pass a clamp trial and have their EVD removed. In order to explore the risk factors associated with delayed VPS placement, we studied a retrospective cohort of SAH patients at our institution. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of SAH patients who had an EVD placed between January 2008 and June 2012 at our institution. We extracted demographic, imaging, and CSF data from the medical record and analyzed risk factors associated with delayed VPS placement. Results. Of 91 patients who passed a clamp trial and had their EVD removed, 12 (13%) required delayed VPS placement at a median of 54 (interquartile range: 15–75) days after EVD removal. After multivariate analysis, risk factors for delayed VPS placement included increased CSF protein concentration within the first 7 days of EVD placement (OR: 1.02, CI: 1–1.04, p = 0.023) and increased third ventricular diameter prior to EVD removal (OR: 1.59, CI: 1.11–2.6, p = 0.026). Conclusion. Patients with increased CSF protein concentration at time of EVD placement and those with increased third ventricular diameter at time of EVD removal should be carefully monitored for development of delayed hydrocephalus.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

This work was supported by the Andrew David Heitman Neurovascular Research Foundation (W.T.K. and C.S.O.). The Foundation had no role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 764.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.