Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the natural history of hyperopic refractive error in relation to the recalled age of first distance prescription.
Methods: A population of adult office workers, coming for a general health check-up without refractive selection, completed a questionnaire about age of first distance prescription and were refracted by an ophthalmologist with non-cycloplegic subjective procedures. Hyperopia was defined as a spherical equivalent of +0.75 diopters or more. This study included 145 hyperopes aged 50–65 years at interview.
Results: The hyperopic subjects were first prescribed spectacles for distance vision in a broad spectrum of ages, from early childhood to adulthood. The subjects with older ages of first prescription tended to develop lower amounts of refractive error but this relation was not significant (Spearman’s rho −0.126, p = 0.131).
Conclusions: The age of first spectacle prescription in hyperopes is not strongly related to the final refractive error developed in adulthood.
KEYWORDS::
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank Ariel Schlaen (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina) for his help with the statistical analysis.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.