358
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A Comparison of Optical and Electrophysiological Methods for Recording Retinal Ganglion Cells during Electrical Stimulation

, , &
Pages 218-227 | Received 27 Jul 2011, Accepted 19 Dec 2011, Published online: 15 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

Purpose/Aim: To compare the efficacy of optical techniques with electrophysiological recordings for mapping retinal activity in response to electrical stimulation.

Materials and Methods: Whole cell patch clamp, Ca2+ imaging (Fluo-4-AM), and Na+ imaging (CoroNa Green-AM) techniques were used to detect responses of neurons from mouse and salamander retina to electrical stimulation.

Results: Synaptic currents were observed in ≥23% of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), indicating presynaptic Ca2+ increases in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Modest depolarization with 20–30 mM K+ consistently evoked Ca2+ responses measured with Fluo4, but Ca2+ responses were almost never evoked by epiretinal stimulation. In salamander retina, responses were seen in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and IPL. In mouse retina, responses were also sometimes seen in the outer pexiform layer (OPL). OPL responses showed a longer latency than IPL responses, suggesting that outer retinal circuits do not trigger synaptic responses of RGCs. Simultaneous Ca2+ imaging and electrophysiological recording of synaptic currents confirmed that Fluo4-loaded retinas remained responsive to stimulation. Epiretinal stimulation evoked action potentials in ≥67% of RGCs. CoroNa Green detected Na+ changes stimulated by 20 mM K+, but epiretinal stimulation did not evoke detectable Na+ responses. Simultaneous imaging and electrophysiological recording confirmed the health of CoroNa Green-loaded retinas. We confirmed stimulation efficacy by simultaneously recording Na+ changes and electrophysiological responses.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that electrophysiological recordings show greater sensitivity than Na+ or Ca2+ imaging in response to electrical stimulation. The paucity of Ca2+ responses is consistent with limited risk for Ca2+-mediated cell damage during electrical stimulation.

Declaration of interest: This work was done through the VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service. This study was supported by a Veterans Administration Merit Review Grant #C6583R, unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Nebraska Research Initiative, and NEI grant EY10542.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.