1,556
Views
78
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Risk Factors for Asthma

Is elective cesarean section associated with a higher risk of asthma? A meta-analysis

, MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , PhD, , MD & , MD, PhD
Pages 16-25 | Received 07 Feb 2014, Accepted 03 Aug 2014, Published online: 27 Aug 2014
 

Abstract

Background: Recent meta-analyses indicate that children delivered by cesarean section have increased risk for asthma. However, the studies included in these previous meta-analyses showed significant heterogeneity. Furthermore, no previous meta-analysis has distinguished the association of elective and emergency CS, spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries (VD) with the odds of asthma. Objective: To examine the association between specific mode of delivery and the prevalence of asthma. Methods: PUBMED, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched to identify relevant studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the prevalence of asthma in children born by elective CS, emergent CS, instrumental VD and spontaneous VD. Meta-analysis was then used to derive a combined OR. Heterogeneity between studies was also tested in the findings. Results: A total of 26 studies were identified. The overall meta-analysis revealed an increase in the risk of asthma in children delivered by CS (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.14, 1.29), and no evidence of heterogeneity was found (I2 = 24.6%). Elective and emergency CS moderately increased the risk of asthma (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.17, 1.25; I2 = 39.9%; OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.19–1.26). The risk of asthma was also higher in the children born by instrumental VD (OR = 1.07, 95% CI, 1.04–1.11) but with evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 54.9%). Conclusion: About 20% increase in the subsequent risk of asthma was both found in children delivered by elective and emergency CS. The increasing rates of CS worldwide might partly explain the concomitant rise in asthma during the same time period.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273091), Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (GWIII-26.2), Doctoral Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (BXJ201222), Xinhua Hospital Foundation (12YJ08) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (13430710300).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.