Differences in planning performance, a neurocognitive endophenotype, are associated with a functional variant in PER3 gene

Abstract

Performance alterations in executive function have been studied as potential endophenotypes for several neuropsychiatric diseases. Planning is an important component of executive function and has been shown to be affected in diseases such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive–compulsive disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Several genes related to dopaminergic systems, such as COMT, have been explored as candidates for influencing planning performance. The circadian clock gene PERIOD3 (PER3) has been shown to be associated with several complex behaviors in humans and could be involved in different signaling mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated the possible association between a functional polymorphism in the PER3 gene (PER3-VNTR, rs57875989) and performance in a commonly used test of planning (Tower of London, TOL) in 229 healthy subjects from Bogotá, Colombia. PER3-VNTR genotyping was carried out with conventional PCR and all participants completed the TOL test using the computerized Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) battery. A linear regression model was used for the analysis of association with the SNPStats program. We found that 4/4 genotype carriers showed a better performance and made fewer moves, in comparison to 4/5 and 5/5 genotype carriers (p = 0.003). These results appear to be independent from effects of this polymorphism on self-reported average hours of sleep during work days in our sample. This is the first evidence of an association between PER3-VNTR and planning performance in a sample of healthy subjects and our results are consistent from previous findings for alterations in other cognitive domains. Future studies examining additional genes could lead to the identification of novel molecular underpinnings of planning in healthy subjects and in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

• Candidate gene
• chronobiology
• cognition
• neurogenetics
• psychiatric genetics

Acknowledgements

We thank the collaboration of the staff of the Clinical Simulation Laboratory, Universidad Antonio Nariño.

Declaration of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

This study was supported by a research grant from Universidad Antonio Nariño (VCTI-UAN, project # 20131079). YG-G was supported by a fellowship from VCTI-UAN (Young Scientists Program).