Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 25, 2013 - Issue 11
336
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Comment on incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard (SM) exposed veterans

Page 651 | Published online: 17 Sep 2013

I read with interest the article by Mohammad Reza Zafarghandi and colleagues on incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard (SM) exposed veterans (Zafarghandi et al., Citation2013). I would like to comment on the “Method and results” and “Conclusion” of this article:

  • The type of the study is more suited to a historical cohort because the investigator chose to identify cohort members based on records of previous exposure, rather than identifying cohort members concurrently with the initiation of the study and planning to have the follow-up period occur during the study (Rothman et al., Citation2010)

  • Why the authors did not control the effect of some more important variables such as exposure episodes, and the use of gas masks that are available for veterans health records.

  • The authors mentioned that using Cox proportional hazards model, hazard ratio of cancer occurrence for SM exposure was calculated. The Cox PH model assumes that the hazard ratio comparing any two specifications of predictors is constant over time. Equivalently, this means that the hazard for one individual is proportional to the hazard for any other individual, where the proportionality constant is independent of time. If time-dependent variables are considered, the Cox model form may no longer satisfies the PH assumption and extended Cox model should be applied instead (Kleinbaum & Klein, Citation2005). Most variables considered in the study (such as smoking statues, education and age) strongly have the properties of time-dependent variables. Why the authors did not use extended Cox model in terms of including time-dependent variables?

  • There is a discrepancy between findings of incidence rate ratio for overall and subgroups of cancers. Since cancer composed of all its subgroups, how the authors explained this discrepancy.

  • Although the incidence rate of cancerdid not differ significantly between groups (SM exposed and non-exposed), authors suggested carcinogenesis of SM following acute exposure during war.

  • We did not have conflict of interest

References

  • Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. (2005). Survival analysis. 2th ed. New York: Springer
  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. (2010). Modern epidemiology. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins
  • Zafarghandi MZ, Soroush MZ, Mahmoodi M, et al. (2013). Incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard exposed veterans: a long-term follow-up cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 24:99–105

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.