Respiratory tract lung geometry and dosimetry model for male Sprague-Dawley rats

Abstract

While inhalation toxicological studies of various compounds have been conducted using a number of different strains of rats, mechanistic dosimetry models have only had tracheobronchial (TB) structural data for Long-Evans rats, detailed morphometric data on the alveolar region of Sprague-Dawley rats and limited alveolar data on other strains. Based upon CT imaging data for two male Sprague-Dawley rats, a 15-generation, symmetric typical path model was developed for the TB region. Literature data for the alveolar region of Sprague-Dawley rats were analyzed to develop an eight-generation model, and the two regions were joined to provide a complete lower respiratory tract model for Sprague-Dawley rats. The resulting lung model was used to examine particle deposition in Sprague-Dawley rats and to compare these results with predicted deposition in Long-Evans rats. Relationships of various physiologic variables and lung volumes were either developed in this study or extracted from the literature to provide the necessary input data for examining particle deposition. While the lengths, diameters and branching angles of the TB airways differed between the two Sprague-Dawley rats, the predicted deposition patterns in the three major respiratory tract regions were very similar. Between Sprague-Dawley and Long-Evans rats, significant differences in TB and alveolar predicted deposition fractions were observed over a wide range of particle sizes, with TB deposition fractions being up to 3- to 4-fold greater in Sprague-Dawley rats and alveolar deposition being significantly greater in Long-Evans rats. Thus, strain-specific lung geometry models should be used for particle deposition calculations and interspecies dose comparisons.

• Breathing parameters
• deposition modeling
• lung geometry
• morphometric variables
• particles
• Sprague-Dawley rats

Acknowledgements

Dr. Philip Kuehl and colleagues at the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute generously provided access to their raw data on respiratory minute volume for F-344 rats of various body weights. These data served as the basis for Figure 3 in this article. The authors appreciate the input received from Drs. Daniel Costa and Jeffrey Tepper on the pros and cons of the Pressure and Barometric boxes for measuring tidal volume and breathing frequency in laboratory animals.