242
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Validation of a P2Y12-receptor specific whole blood platelet aggregation assay

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 668-672 | Received 03 Dec 2015, Accepted 09 Feb 2016, Published online: 11 Apr 2016
 

Abstract

Testing of P2Y12-receptor antagonist effects can support clinical decision-making. However, most platelet function assays use only ADP as agonist which is not P2Y12-receptor specific. For this reason P2Y12-receptor specific assays have been developed by adding prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to reduce ADP-induced platelet activation via the P2Y1-receptor. The present study sought to evaluate a P2Y12-receptor specific assay for determination of pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes. This study enrolled 400 patients undergoing coronary stenting after loading with clopidogrel or prasugrel. ADP-induced platelet reactivity was assessed by whole blood aggregometry at multiple time points with a standard ADP assay (ADPtest) and a P2Y12-receptor specific assay (ADPtest HS, both run on Multiplate Analyzer, Roche Diagnostics). Patients were clinically followed for 1 month and all events adjudicated by an independent committee. In total, 2084 pairs of test results of ADPtest and ADPtest HS were available showing a strong correlation between results of both assays (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). These findings prevailed in multiple prespecified subgroups (e.g., age; body mass index; diabetes). Calculated cutoffs for ADPtest HS and the established cutoffs of ADPtest showed a substantial agreement for prediction of ischemic and hemorrhagic events with a Cohen’s κ of 0.66 and 0.66, respectively. The P2Y12-receptor specific ADPtest HS assay appears similarly predictive for pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes as compared to the established ADPtest assay indicating its applicability for clinical use. Further evaluation in large cohorts is needed to determine if P2Y12-receptor specific testing offers any advantage for prediction of clinical outcome.

Funding

This trial was supported by the German Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research and the University Heart Center Freiburg–Bad Krozingen.

Declaration of Interest

Dr. Hochholzer reports receiving lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Stratz reports receiving lecture fees from Eli Lilly. Dr. Trenk reports receiving consulting and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Otsuka, and Sanofi. All other authors report no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Funding

This trial was supported by the German Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research and the University Heart Center Freiburg–Bad Krozingen.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.