Effects of Russian current and low-frequency pulsed current on discomfort level and current amplitude at 10% maximal knee extensor torque

Abstract

Background: Low-frequency pulsed current (LFPC) and Russian current (RC), a type of kilohertz-frequency alternating current, have been frequently used for muscle strengthening in rehabilitation programs. Despite the popularity of these current types, it is unclear which is most effectively able to generate a similar submaximal torque with minimal discomfort and current amplitude. Objective: To compare discomfort and current amplitude between LFPC and RC to achieve a knee extensor torque of 10% of the maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC). Methods: Twenty-two healthy subjects were subjected to three electrically elicited knee extensor submaximal contractions (10% MIVC) that were sustained for 10 seconds. The current amplitude required to achieve 10% MIVC and subjective discomfort were assessed directly by the electrical stimulator and with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale, respectively. A paired t-test was used to determine differences between the electrical currents (α = 0.05). Results: LFPC required significantly lower current amplitude (15%) and a lower discomfort level (50%) to achieve 10% of MIVC compared to RC. Conclusion: LFPC current seems to be more effective than RC with respect to discomfort level and current amplitude to produce 10% of MIVC.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank FINEP-Brazil and CNPq-Brazil for their financial support. The authors would also like to thank Guilherme Hoffmann for his technical assistance.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest.