Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 29, 2013 - Issue 2
225
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH REPORTS

Comparison of shoulder resultant net moment between three different exercises and load conditions

, , MSc, PT, , , MSc, PT, , , MSc, PT, , , MSc, PT, , , PT, , , PT & , , PhD show all
Pages 124-132 | Accepted 23 May 2012, Published online: 05 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

Different exercises are prescribed by physiotherapists and despite the popular use of elastic resistance, few studies have investigated the effect of such rehabilitation tools on shoulder resultant net moment (RNM). The aim of the present study was to compare shoulder RNM peak values and the respective angle of occurrence during three shoulder rehabilitation exercises: 1) elevation in the scapular plane; 2) flexion; and 3) abduction when performed in three different load situations: 1) without external load; 2) with dumbbells (DB); and 3) with elastic resistance. Twenty-one healthy subjects participated in the study. Kinematic data were obtained by means of an inverse dynamic model. A two-way ANOVA was used for data analysis (α  <  0.05). The highest RNM peak for abductor and external rotator muscles was during shoulder abduction exercise and for flexor muscles was during flexion and elevation in the scapular plane. The DB load condition was associated with highest RNM peak values for all muscle groups. This study presents differences among three exercises and load situations for RNM peak values and angle of occurrence. Furthermore, it also presents theoretical rationale for load progress and selection of exercises for shoulder rehabilitation management. Clinicians should consider it, when prescribing strengthening exercises for shoulder rehabilitation.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from CAPES – Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.

Declaration of interest: The authors confirm that there are no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) the present work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.