Treating gynecological pain: the experiences of bachelor students in physiotherapy performing somatocognitive therapy

Abstract

Background: Longstanding gynecological pain affects large numbers of women in the Western world. In recently published studies, we have found that a hybrid of physiotherapy and cognitive psychotherapy called somatocognitive therapy (SCT) ameliorates physical symptoms and psychological distress. In this paper, we report on the experiences of undergraduate physiotherapy students performing the therapy to patients with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Aim: The study aimed to investigate the nature of the collaborative interaction between female physiotherapy students and patients with PVD, focusing on critical factors for the students' learning of professional skills through SCT applied on patients suffering from an especially demanding pain condition. Methods: In a qualitative study design, data were collected from two group interviews with four female students in pairs, and subjected to a thematic analysis. Results: We found that students perceive the patient encounter as critical incidents in the sense of strong emotional encounters. From the data material, there emerged a four-step process ranging from distance to proximity, highlighting factors that influence the development of professional skills. The four steps are defined respectively as: (1) the students' prejudices; (2) identification and empathy; (3) senses of responsibility in the therapeutic relationship and (4) collaborative engagement for change. Comments: Contrary to expectations, the students experienced the application of this combined approach (SCT) as an interesting and rewarding way of working with patients, and that they had achieved skills and a sufficient set of tools to cope with the challenges that patients with longstanding gynecological pain represent.

• Chronical pelvic pain
• physiotherapy
• PVD
• somatocognitive therapy
• students' learning
• therapeutic alliance

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.