The trees and the forest: mixed methods in the assessment of recovery based interventions' processes and outcomes in mental health

Abstract

Background: Recent developments in mental health have emphasized recovery as an outcome for people with serious mental illness (SMI). Accordingly, several studies have attempted to evaluate the process and outcome of recovery-oriented psychosocial interventions.

Aims: To review and discuss quantitative and qualitative findings from previous efforts to study the impact of five recovery-oriented interventions: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT), Supported Employment (SE), Supported Socialization (SS), and Family Psychoeducation.

Methods: Reviewing the literature on studies that examine the effectiveness of these interventions by using both quantitative and qualitative approach.

Results: Qualitative findings in these studies augment quantitative findings and at times draw attention to unexpected findings and uniquely illuminate the effects of these interventions on self-reflective processes.

Conclusions: There is a need for further exploration of how mixed-methods can be implemented to explore recovery-oriented outcomes. Critical questions regarding the implications of qualitative findings are posed.

Keywords:

• mixed methods
• recovery
• psychosocial interventions

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.