![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: Despite the ongoing controversy regarding which types of stressors or resources contribute to psychological distress, there has been little research examining the relationship between war trauma, normative stressors, family resources for management and psychopathology.
Aims: This study investigated the differences between mothers and fathers in psychological distress, normative stressors and war atrocities experienced, and family’s resources for management. It was hypothesized that a combination of risk variables and protective variables would be predictive of psychological distress in parents.
Methods: Questionnaires were used with 205 Palestinian parents from Gaza Strip.
Results: Mothers had more psychiatric disorders than did fathers. Although, mothers and fathers were exposed to comparable levels of normative stressors, mothers concerns about intrafamily strains, and family legal violations were greater than they were for fathers. Results revealed that fathers possess a larger repertoire of resources for management when compared to mothers reflected in esteem and communication, mastery and health, extended family social support and financial well-being. However, mastery and health seem to buffer the effect of war traumas and normative stressors on neuroticism in both parents.
Conclusion: The different patterns of predictor–outcome relations have practical as well as theoretical implications.
Declaration of interest
This research was supported by Gaza Community Mental Health Programme (GCMHP).