708
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care – a qualitative study

, , &
Pages 2085-2094 | Received 14 Apr 2015, Accepted 26 Oct 2015, Published online: 05 Jan 2016
 

Abstract

Purpose: Exploring healthcare professional experiences of Multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) in primary care.

Methods: Fourteen healthcare professionals (11 women, 3 men) were individually interviewed about their work with MMR in primary care. Interviews covered experiences of assessing patients and work with patients in the programme. Transcribed interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results: The analysis resulted in four categories: select patients for success; a multilevel challenge; ethical dilemmas and considering what is a good result. MMR work was experienced as useful and efficient, but also challenging because of patient complexity. Preconceptions about who is a suitable patient for MMR influenced the selection of patients (e.g. gender, different culture). Interviewees were conflicted about not to being able to offer MMR to patients who were not going to return to work. They thought that there were more factors to evaluate MMR than by the proportion that return to work.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals perceive MMR as a helpful method for treating chronic pain patients. At the same time, they thought that only including patients who would return to work conflicted with their ethical views on equal healthcare for all patients. Preconceptions can influence selection for, and work with, MMR.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • Multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary healthcare is challenging because of the complexity of the patients.

  • Healthcare professionals must deal with conflicting emotions in regard to different commitments from healthcare legislation and the goals of multimodal rehabilitation.

  • Healthcare professionals should be aware that stereotypes regarding gender and immigrants can lead to bias when selecting patients for multimodal rehabilitation.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the healthcare professionals who shared their rich stories.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declaration of interest. This study was supported by the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, the research programme REHSAM.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.