Native voice, self-concept and the moral case for personalized voice technology

Abstract

Purpose (1) To explore the role of native voice and effects of voice loss on self-concept and identity, and survey the state of assistive voice technology; (2) to establish the moral case for developing personalized voice technology. Methods This narrative review examines published literature on the human significance of voice, the impact of voice loss on self-concept and identity, and the strengths and limitations of current voice technology. Based on the impact of voice loss on self and identity, and voice technology limitations, the moral case for personalized voice technology is developed. Results Given the richness of information conveyed by voice, loss of voice constrains expression of the self, but the full impact is poorly understood. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices facilitate communication but, despite advances in this field, voice output cannot yet express the unique nuances of individual voice. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and equality of opportunity establish the moral responsibility to invest in accessible, cost-effective, personalized voice technology. Conclusions Although further research is needed to elucidate the full effects of voice loss on self-concept, identity and social functioning, current understanding of the profoundly negative impact of voice loss establishes the moral case for developing personalized voice technology.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Rehabilitation of voice-disordered patients should facilitate self-expression, interpersonal connectedness and social/occupational participation.

• Proactive questioning about the psychological and social experiences of patients with voice loss is a valuable entry point for rehabilitation planning.

• Personalized voice technology would enhance sense of self, communicative participation and autonomy and promote shared healthcare decision-making.

• Further research is needed to identify the best strategies to preserve and strengthen identity and sense of self.

Keywords:

• Augmentative and alternative communication systems
• bioethics
• self-concept
• voice disorders

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Summer McGee for her guidance and comments on early drafts; Nate Cade for his insights on the potential role of US government departments; and Boaz Nathanson, whose shared interest in this topic helped shape my thinking on the subject.

Disclosure statement

The author reports no conflicts of interest.