Abstract
Purpose To explore perceived barriers and facilitators to the use of the New Zealand (NZ) stroke guidelines by occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Methods A qualitative descriptive methodology was used. Eligible physiotherapists and occupational therapists (NZ registered, working in one of two hospitals, treating at least 10 patients with stroke in the previous year) were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to elicit their perceptions of the utility and feasibility of the NZ stroke guidelines and identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Conventional content analysis with constant comparative methods was used for coding and analysis. Results The main themes influencing guideline implementation were resources and characteristics of the guidelines, the organization, the patient and family and the therapist. Insufficient resources were a major barrier that crossed many of the themes. Participants suggested a range of strategies relating to the organization to improve therapists’ alignment to the guidelines. Conclusion Alignment to the guidelines in NZ is influenced both positively and negatively by a range of interacting factors, consistent with other studies. Alignment might be improved by the introduction of some relatively simple strategies, such as ring-fencing time for access to resources and training in the use of the guidelines. Many of the barriers and related interventions are likely to be more complex.
Alignment with stroke guidelines has been shown to improve patient outcomes.
Therapist alignment with the implementation of the New Zealand stroke guidelines is influenced by guideline characteristics, organizational characteristics, resources, patient and family characteristics and therapist characteristics.
Frequently encountered barriers related to limited resources, particularly time.
Ring-fencing regular time for access to resources and training in the use of guidelines are examples of simple strategies that may reduce barriers.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the time given by all the participants.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Funding information
At the time of this research, Suzie Mudge was the recipient of a post doctoral research fellowship funded by the Waitemata District Health Board. Anna Hart and Sankaran Murugan were recipients of Waitemata District Health Board Summer Research Awards at AUT University.