Obstacles and Opportunities for Multi-disciplinary Working in Drug Misuse: a case study

Abstract

This paper examines the lack of congruence between national policy documents and local practice in multi-disciplinary working with drug users, by reporting on a case study within one English county. It gives an analysis of the roles and responsibilities of generic service providers and a minority of specialists, based on 100 interviews and questionnaires with representatives from professional groups involved with drug issues. The respondents worked with a range of young people and adults. Whilst professionals worked well within broad disciplines such as health or education, they did not operate as well across disciplinary boundaries. Many of the respondents were unsure about the specific role of their own profession, and which group they should target for drug interventions. There was a lack of clarity about what approach was appropriate to their traditional target group in terms of drugs, and consequently many did not utilize their established approach for that group. When the reasons for the lack of co-working were examined, it was found that there were many misconceptions among professionals concerning what other professional groups actually did in response to drugs. The authors clarify the reasons for the apparent confusion and highlight the possibility that a traditional generic approach and target group may not provide an appropriate match in terms of drug intervention. They make recommendations for overcoming these obstacles to multi-disciplinary working and consider the implications for training.