174
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Flow-Mediated Dilatation Assessment in Women with Preeclampsia Compared to Women with Gestational Hypertension

, , &
Pages 377-386 | Published online: 21 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Objectives. To assess flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in women with preeclampsia (PE) versus gestational hypertension (GH) and to determine if results of this ultrasound method vary with modifications to the technique. Methods. Pregnant women with hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) were recruited. Women were allocated to the PE group if they had proteinuria ≥300 mg/24 h. FMDo was calculated from the percentage difference in baseline and post-occlusion (PO) diameter at 45–60 s and FMDmax from baseline and maximum diameter between 45 and 90 s. FMDmax was adjusted for hematocrit and shear rate. Results. FMDo (m ± SD) was similar (p = 0.83) in the no medication GH (5.3 ± 3.2; n = 15) and the PE (6.5 ± 4.1; n = 13) groups. FMDo was reduced (p < 0.001) in the medication GH (3.7 ± 2.8; n = 23) versus the PE (8.8 ± 4.3; n = 25) groups. For FMDmax the interaction between group and medication was not significant (both p = 0.08) in unadjusted analysis or analysis adjusted for covariates hematocrit (p = 0.023) and shear rate (p = 0.007). Means averaged over medication are presented. FMDmax was reduced (p < 0.0001) in the GH (5.7 ± 4.0; n = 38) versus the PE group (9.2 ± 4.0; n = 38). Of the PE women, 79% (30/38) reached maximum dilatation by 90 s compared with 63% (24/38) of the GH women (chi-square, p = 0.16). Conclusions. The FMDmax analysis revealed reduced FMD in GH women compared with PE women. We therefore hypothesize that PE may be a different disease to GH. Our work demonstrates differing results in FMDo and FMDmax because of modifications in the technique. Previous work on PE and FMD may not be definitive due to this evolving technique.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Philips Medical Systems for the loan of an ultrasound transducer and the women of Sydney West Area Health Service for volunteering their time.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.