5
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Ventricles in the United States

, , , &
Pages 1-24 | Received 24 Jun 1974, Published online: 11 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

A cooperative, comparative evaluation of nine artificial ventricles was performed on two standardized mock circulations. The ventricles included five air-driven diaphragm types, three sack types and a mechanically driven type. The slopes of the ventricular output curves varied from 0.04 to 0.88 at 0 to 5 Torr filling pressure and the maximum ventricular output varied from 3.8 to 11.9 liters/ min at 100 Torr outflow pressure. All ventricles had decreased output with increased outflow pressures (70 to 130 Torr). Hetnolysis index ratio (HI test/HI std) for HI std = 0.024 ±.005 (± 1 SD) g/100 liters (N = 12), was +21.5 and +6.9 for a Dacron cloth and fibril heart, respectively, +2.0 to +2. 86 for three sack ventricles, and +3.2 for a smooth diaphragm ventricle. The mechanical ventricle with a sinusoidal driving waveform and smooth surface had the lowest hemolysis, HI = 0.008 ± 0.003 (±1 SD) (N = 6). Sack ventricles caused marked hemolysis if the walls touched during systole. Ventricular dimensions varied: weight 116 to 700 g, length 9.2 to 18.7 cm, and volume 235 to 430 ml.

Performance data was returned to each individual laboratory which resulted in modification of ventricular design in at least three instances. Comparative, standardized testing of artificial ventricles may shorten development time and provide performance criteria for application in man.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.