3,103
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Contradictions in client-centred discharge planning: through the lens of relational autonomy

, , &
Pages 293-301 | Received 17 Dec 2014, Accepted 04 Feb 2015, Published online: 24 Feb 2015
 

Abstract

Background: While client-centred practice has received wide support, it remains difficult to apply in many practice settings. Identified barriers include constraints on time, resources, and services imposed by healthcare policies. Healthcare professionals’ prioritizing of client safety over (other) interests that clients may name may further restrict the application of client-centred practice. Discharge planning is one area where such considerations can conflict. Aim: This paper presents a secondary analysis of data examining the process of discharge in one Canadian rehabilitation setting. It examines how discourses of client-centred practice and of prioritizing safety were reflected in discharge planning with older adults and considers the implications of potential conflicts between these discourses. Method: Taking a critical bioethics perspective informed by relational autonomy theory, microethnographic case studies were used to examine discharge planning from the perspectives of older adult clients and healthcare professionals. Results: Healthcare professionals interpreted client-centred practice to require abiding by client wishes, as long as this was safe; furthermore prioritizing safety took precedence over other considerations in discharge planning. Conclusion and significance: Client-centred practice was not promoted in discharge planning processes in the research setting. Applying a relational autonomy lens to practice could promote approaches that better facilitate client-centred practice.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the research participants for their willingness to share their stories with us. They are grateful to Drs Susan Rappolt, Barbara E. Gibson, and Kathryn Morgan for their notable contributions to the development of this work. DThey thank the Ontario Graduate Scholarships programme, the Margaret and Howard Gamble Scholarships, and the Peterborough K. M. Hunter Graduate Studentships for their generous funding of Evelyne Durocher during the completion of this work. Matthew Hunt is supported by a research scholar award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.