Patient safety and professional discourses: implications for interprofessionalism

Abstract

Patient safety has been presented as a unifying concern across the health professions. This conceptual connection has been accompanied with efforts towards standardized, interprofessional safety competencies, as well as increased attention towards interprofessional education for systems improvement. Despite numerous program initiatives and research endeavors, progress towards improving patient safety in hospitals is viewed as disappointingly slow. This paper adds to a body of literature that suggests patient safety remains a difficult problem to solve because safety is not simply a technical issue, but is a practice embedded in organizational and professional contexts. In this paper, we explore the differences between the professions, as different professional groups intersect with the ways patient safety is thought about, talked about, and known about in an acute care hospital in Canada. We draw on findings from a critical discourse analysis of documents related to patient safety, as well as transcripts from interviews from (a) formal health care leaders and (b) practicing clinicians from medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work. This analysis suggests implications for the way different professions may or may not work with one another in the service of patient safety.

• Critical discourse analysis
• interprofessional care
• policy
• qualitative method
• team-based care

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted as part of the first author’s doctoral dissertation. The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the other members of the doctoral committee to this work. The authors would also like to acknowledge the helpful suggestions from the two anonymous reviewers of an earlier manuscript.