174
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

3D morphometric analysis of laminae and facet joints in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 756-760 | Received 19 Nov 2014, Accepted 30 Dec 2014, Published online: 04 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Objective. To clarify the three-dimensional (3D) morphometric characteristics of the spine in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).

Methods. 3D morphometric analyses of laminae and facets were performed and compared for a DS group, an age-matched spinal canal stenosis (LCS) group, and a control group of young persons without spinal disease. 3D facet sagittal angles (3D-FSAs), 3D facet axial angle (3D-FAAs), and 3D-FAA tropism at L3 and at L4 were measured by extracting the 3D inferior articular process. The 3D lamina inclination angles (3D-LIAs) of L3 and L4 were also measured by extracting the ventral surface of the laminae.

Results. The 3D-FSAs at L4 in the DS group were significantly higher than for the other groups, but the difference in 3D-FSAs at L3 was not statistically significant among the groups. The 3D-FAAs at L4 in the DS group were significantly lower than in the control group. There was no significant difference in other factors.

Conclusions. 3D morphometric analysis clarified that DS is significantly correlated with horizontalization (higher 3D-FSA), but is not correlated with sagittalization (lower 3D-FAA) and tropism (3D-FAA tropism) of facet joints or horizontalization of laminae (3D-LIA). There were no morphometric characteristics at the cranial adjacent segment of DS.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ryoji Nakao for assisting with software programming. Medical editor Katharine O’Moore-Klopf, ELS (East Setauket, NY) provided professional English-language editing of this article.

Conflict of interest

Conflicts of interest and source of funding: None.

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript. The review board of our institution approved the study reported in this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.