189
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Glycosylated hemoglobin level in the second trimester predicts birth weight and amniotic fluid volume in non-diabetic pregnancies with abnormal screening test

, , &
Pages 1193-1199 | Received 15 Sep 2009, Accepted 25 Nov 2009, Published online: 11 Jan 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. To investigate relationship between glycemic control in first half of pregnancy by measuring mid-pregnancy HbA1c and neonatal birth weight and amniotic fluid volume.

Methods. We prospectively enrolled 220 pregnant women who received oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after positive gestational diabetes mellitus screening. We included 102 women with normal OGTT results into final analysis. We measured birth weight and amniotic fluid index (AFI) at 32–34 weeks.

Results. Mean birth weight was 3313 ± 426 g, and 15.7% of neonates were classified as large-for-gestational age (LGA). Mean Hb1Ac was 4.96 ± 0.28%. Median AFI was 145 mm, and polyhydramnios rate was 2.9%. Birth weight was positively correlated with HbA1c level (r = 0.373, p < 0.001) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI; r = 0.351, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that HbA1c and pre-pregnancy BMI were positive independent determinants of neonatal birth weight, and HbA1c was positive independent determinant of AFI. Receiver operating characeristics curve identified HbA1c level of 4.99 as optimal threshold for prediction of LGA with 93.8% sensitivity, 61.6% specificity and positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 2.45 and pre-pregnancy BMI value of 25.2 as optimal threshold for prediction of LGA with 81.3% sensitivity, 57% specificity and +LR of 1.9.

Conclusion. In non-diabetic pregnant women with abnormal screening test, mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and pre-pregnacy BMI may predict neonatal birth weight. AFI in 32–34 weeks of gestation is related with mid-pregnacy HbA1c level.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.