172
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Estimation of fetal weight before delivery in low-resource setting of North-west Nigeria: can we rely on our clinical skills?

, &
Pages 949-953 | Received 03 May 2014, Accepted 23 Jun 2014, Published online: 17 Jul 2014
 

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of sonographic versus clinical methods of fetal weight estimation in a low-resource setting.

Methods: This was a prospective study. Ethical clearance and informed consent were obtained. Two hundred (200) women admitted for delivery were assessed. Questionnaires and data collection forms were used to obtain socio-demographic and other clinical information. The actual weight was determined at birth. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was compared with the actual weight (BW). The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical software. The accuracy of clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimation was compared using Students’ t-test, Chi-square test and Pearsons’ coefficient of correlation and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean of absolute percentage error was smaller for ultrasonic (9.8 ± 7.2) than clinical (10.5 ± 7.5) estimation, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.083). In the 2.5–3.99 kg group there was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute percentage errors for the two methods (p = 0.096). In the <2.5 kg group, clinical method overestimated birth-weight while in ≥4.0 kg, the sonographic method underestimated the birth weight. For birth weight 2.5–3.99 kg, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 96.9, 76.9, 98.1, 66.7% and 96.8, 75, 96.8, 75% for sonographic and clinical estimates, respectively. The predictive powers of sonographic and clinical methods were better for low birth weight and macrosomic fetuses, respectively.

Conclusion: Clinical method of fetal weight estimation can only be recommended for use as screening tool for normal weight and macrosomic fetuses.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the technical assistance granted by Dr Abiodun Omole-Ohonsi (Reader in Obstetrics and Gynaecology), Dr Anas Ismail (Consultant Radiologist) and Dr Zubairu Ilyasu (Reader in Public Health) during the preparation of this manuscript. Ethical approval was obtained from Ethical Committee of Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.

Declaration of interest

There is no conflict of interests. This research was funded by the authors.

Contribution

Ugwa EA: Conception, research design, data collection, analysis and main body of research.

Gaya S: Research design, proof-reading

Ashimi A: Research design, proof-reading

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.