123
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cervical assessment in women with hysteroscopic uterine septum resection: a retrospective cohort study

, , , &
Pages 1068-1072 | Received 23 May 2014, Accepted 04 Jul 2014, Published online: 05 Aug 2014
 

Abstract

Objective: To estimate whether cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in women with a history of hysteroscopic uterine septum resection predicts spontaneous preterm birth <35 weeks’ gestation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared women who had undergone hysteroscopic metroplasty, and were subsequently pregnant with singleton gestations delivered January 2003 to December 2012, to a low-risk control group. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical lengths were measured 16–30 weeks’ gestation. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <35 weeks’ gestation and the primary exposure variable of interest was cervical length.

Results: Women with a uterine septum resected (N = 24) had a shorter cervical length (2.90 cm) than the low-risk control group (N = 141, 4.31 cm, p < 0.0001); and were more likely to have a cervical length <3.0 cm (41.7% versus 1.4%, p < 0.0001), <2.5 cm (33.3% versus 0%, p < 0.0001), <2.0 cm (16.7% versus 0%, p < 0.0001) and <1.5 cm (12.5% versus 0%, p = 0.003). Women with septum resected were more likely to receive corticosteroids (33.3% versus 11.3%, p = 0.010), but were not more likely to have a spontaneous preterm birth <35 weeks (4.2% versus 0.7%, p = 0.27). There were no differences noted in secondary outcomes including neonatal morbidity.

Conclusion: Pregnant women with a history of a hysteroscopic uterine septum resection have shorter cervical lengths than low-risk controls but may not be at a higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth <35 weeks’ gestation. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to evaluate this group of women to determine if transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical length assessment is of benefit.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding for this study was provided by the Janeway Research Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.